Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:83233 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 11518 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2015 19:07:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Feb 2015 19:07:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.17.20 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.17.20 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.17.20] ([212.227.17.20:49353] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C5/00-10294-C6436E45 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:07:26 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([91.67.244.80]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LswqM-1XQl6z2yOw-012VN4; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 20:07:19 +0100 Message-ID: <54E6346C.10508@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 20:07:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nikita Nefedov , Rasmus Lerdorf , "internals@lists.php.net" References: <54E5456E.4020103@gmx.de> <54E54E1E.1010906@lerdorf.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:o5ohu54HoFZrP/nmTa22ByiBv/lLJksXWMNOX1Lj4c4Wdgr4o15 GuTtDdnwc0amdIpOf4mlcP25xtkCgGiEEk9A6Jyaa/WBo0cKJGhteWYIlf4jL87kTo7B/y9 bI8OZKcbMOHXNFCYrUOSx0vlzWpnYIw4GeWPBM927YkXUCMXnFAQfQOADPr9cOgsqCHpkoV ogI1vKzjkxj6MhCjSC/hg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Digit separators for numeric literals From: cmbecker69@gmx.de (Christoph Becker) Nikita Nefedov wrote: > 2015-02-19 6:44 GMT+04:00 Rasmus Lerdorf : >> >> I think it will be difficult to find a separator character that doesn't >> make a mess of the grammar. > > Why not space? It's certainly possible (I just checked) and it would look > clear I guess: > > my_func(1 999 999); By the same reasoning spaces could be allowed for identifiers as well, e.g. my func(1 999 999); Too confusing and error prone, IMHO. -- Christoph M. Becker