Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:83216 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 73344 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2015 16:06:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Feb 2015 16:06:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.53 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.53 mail-qg0-f53.google.com Received: from [209.85.192.53] ([209.85.192.53:47839] helo=mail-qg0-f53.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id BD/E0-18870-30A06E45 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:06:28 -0500 Received: by mail-qg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id f51so7098040qge.12 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:06:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=VU7JgU962xjzg4tz6I9NABVjJFxxbv6QJnx5ZhKmDDs=; b=KV76Ih6dcaqocrKia8H/tMKB3a7cljSqmD4iUguqG7nFpQCsltNtPLaoUWNjdn0eGJ rzqJf35usyz8qU401O9Kkur+hwSbUd7yP4NI8DX8YK6HvhCK0Q5a5+9MWbRvE3UPHX+a 6EW7AaEsBhVjHhYLOGlZNhK6EZxQ4iP5L0KazQBJ9GMqJw1Hx/SAWVrOdndEGbh7r8Kk 4VGKjax0pwuUpFq+vH9Xx/rfsnVwmGhgd4fyg/9kzmaRTzpz1+qVAPoJtrSn8dQfZ3/B MZl2M3+qmC2KNQW7aj78T6pqWUfcRycciDq99e/2nIYRsABrHogybxPPuJpaZ/BAXRlD eW6Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.232.84 with SMTP id d81mr13631907qhc.15.1424361984396; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:06:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.39.195 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:06:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:06:24 -0800 Message-ID: To: Dmitry Stogov Cc: Joe Watkins , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Expectations From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:16 AM, Dmitry Stogov wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Pierre Joye wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:09 AM, Joe Watkins >>> wrote: >>> > Morning internals, >>> > >>> > The expectations RFC is now in voting phase: >>> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/expectations#vote >>> >>> I totally miss the Expectation RFC announcement. Where the RFC was >>> actually proposed for discussions. >>> >>> I have been following up the DbC thread, seeing some mentions but >>> that's it. The RFC itself popped up 3 days ago. >> >> >> It's from 2013 > > Yes, but.... > >> and it was discussed actively during last week. > > Still, no announce for a discussion about this specific RFC. And > really, the content of the RFC is almost empty, pointing to the ML > archive is really not the right way :) So, back to more useful feedback. I like the concept and idea but still not sure about the custom exception vs AssertException. My gut feeling tells me that it could be better to solve that prior this vote, which actually asks to choose something we did not define yet. It could be in the same RFC (and making it more complete while being at it). -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org