Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:83176
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.180 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <043301d04c3b$60f1b8a0$22d529e0$@php.net>
References: <CAAyV7nGjdguX=4Nt0H=kYnwg8rZ1BkWf8duGZfzheOXXV61pqA@mail.gmail.com>
	<54E564E0.4040901@birkholz.biz>
	<54E56A23.9060305@birkholz.biz>
	<54E5B527.9070307@lsces.co.uk>
	<043301d04c3b$60f1b8a0$22d529e0$@php.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 07:51:47 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAyV7nG=u0MMx+ETwsq+qBd9_tQ8bYXsEVcY0mppa+7d5FE5EA@mail.gmail.com>
To: francois@php.net
Cc: Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk>, "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC-Discuss] Scalar Type Declarations v0.5
From: ircmaxell@gmail.com (Anthony Ferrara)

Francois and Lester (and all),

Please keep this thread on-topic. It should be for technical
discussions around this RFC only. If you have something non-technical
to discuss, please start a new topic.

Thanks

Anthony

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Fran=C3=A7ois Laupretre <francois@php.net>=
 wrote:
>> De : Lester Caine [mailto:lester@lsces.co.uk]
>>
>> On 19/02/15 04:44, Dennis Birkholz wrote:
>> > I just saw the reddit where you mention that v0.4 is practically
>> > abandoned now, so I will just renounce my previous mail!
>>
>> DO NOT USE OTHER CHANNELS!
>
> Agreed.
>
> And the RFC was not abandoned at all. I and others have been working almo=
st continuously on a 'compromise' single-mode approach during the last 3 da=
ys (and nights), as activity on the list shows with no doubt. So,  pretendi=
ng the RFC to be 'abandoned' is just a way to discard a disagreed work.
>
> As long as she does not officially gives up (posting to the list), I'll k=
eep considering Sara still has the lead on scalar type hinting. If she offi=
cially gives up, I'll immediately propose to take it over and, if we are se=
veral to want it, we'll discuss.
>
> That's the rule and I encourage list members to explicitly show their sup=
port to the formal process we all agreed upon.
>
> For the rest, Lester summarized quite well my view about designing PHP fo=
r static analysis, instead of static analysis for PHP ;)
>
> Regards
>
> Fran=C3=A7ois
>
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>