Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:83143
Return-Path: <dennis@birkholz.biz>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 3110 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2015 04:44:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 19 Feb 2015 04:44:25 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dennis@birkholz.biz; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dennis@birkholz.biz; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain birkholz.biz does not designate 144.76.185.252 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dennis@birkholz.biz
X-Host-Fingerprint: 144.76.185.252 mx01.nexxes.net  
Received: from [144.76.185.252] ([144.76.185.252:54231] helo=mx01.nexxes.net)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id EA/04-08593-62A65E45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 23:44:23 -0500
Received: from [137.226.183.192] (ip3192.saw.rwth-aachen.de [137.226.183.192])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: db220660-p0g-1@packages.nexxes.net)
	by mx01.nexxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1AA9482444
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 05:44:19 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <54E56A23.9060305@birkholz.biz>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 05:44:19 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <CAAyV7nGjdguX=4Nt0H=kYnwg8rZ1BkWf8duGZfzheOXXV61pqA@mail.gmail.com> <54E564E0.4040901@birkholz.biz>
In-Reply-To: <54E564E0.4040901@birkholz.biz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC-Discuss] Scalar Type Declarations v0.5
From: dennis@birkholz.biz (Dennis Birkholz)

Am 19.02.2015 um 05:21 schrieb Dennis Birkholz:
> Am 18.02.2015 um 21:44 schrieb Anthony Ferrara:
>> Since the resignation of Andrea, the mixed-mode type hint (called
>> declaration in the proposal) proposal has been left abandoned.
>> Considering that the ending votes were 67/34 (66.3%) with several
>> no-votes being only due to reasonably minor issues with the proposal,
>> I would like to re-propose her RFC with three minor modifications:
> 
> What about Sara's "Scalar Type Hints v0.4" discussion? I find it
> disturbing that you take over the RFC without even mentioning this
> discussion. Please coordinate with Sara first before starting another
> attempt that will be doomed because some people rather wait for Sara's
> RFC and a "<?php // strict" option.

I just saw the reddit where you mention that v0.4 is practically
abandoned now, so I will just renounce my previous mail!

Will you consider to let the people vote on how to enable strict mode
like discussed in the v0.4 discussion? Like this here from the "Reviving
scalar type hints" thread?

Am 17.02.2015 um 00:58 schrieb Sara Golemon:> Straw poll:
> 1) <?php strict;
> 2) <?php-strict
> 3) use strict; (psuedo-namespace)
> 4) <?php // strict (I don't actually like HHVM's style, but if you do...)
> 5) declare(strict=true); (As a top-level declare only)
> 6) declare(strict=true); (exactly as in v0.3 -- maybe you liked it)
> 7) your write-in vote here

Thanks
Dennis