Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:83142 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 892 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2015 04:21:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Feb 2015 04:21:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dennis@birkholz.biz; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dennis@birkholz.biz; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain birkholz.biz does not designate 144.76.185.252 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dennis@birkholz.biz X-Host-Fingerprint: 144.76.185.252 mx01.nexxes.net Received: from [144.76.185.252] ([144.76.185.252:54141] helo=mx01.nexxes.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 61/B3-08593-4E465E45 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 23:21:57 -0500 Received: from [137.226.183.192] (ip3192.saw.rwth-aachen.de [137.226.183.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: db220660-p0g-1@packages.nexxes.net) by mx01.nexxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A48ED482444 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 05:21:52 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54E564E0.4040901@birkholz.biz> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 05:21:52 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC-Discuss] Scalar Type Declarations v0.5 From: dennis@birkholz.biz (Dennis Birkholz) Am 18.02.2015 um 21:44 schrieb Anthony Ferrara: > Since the resignation of Andrea, the mixed-mode type hint (called > declaration in the proposal) proposal has been left abandoned. > Considering that the ending votes were 67/34 (66.3%) with several > no-votes being only due to reasonably minor issues with the proposal, > I would like to re-propose her RFC with three minor modifications: What about Sara's "Scalar Type Hints v0.4" discussion? I find it disturbing that you take over the RFC without even mentioning this discussion. Please coordinate with Sara first before starting another attempt that will be doomed because some people rather wait for Sara's RFC and a "