Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:83130
Return-Path: <leight@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 63786 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2015 22:28:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 18 Feb 2015 22:28:36 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=leight@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=leight@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.51 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: leight@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.51 mail-yh0-f51.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.213.51] ([209.85.213.51:33398] helo=mail-yh0-f51.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id C6/DD-25021-31215E45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:28:35 -0500
Received: by yhl29 with SMTP id 29so2974059yhl.0
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:28:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=mPTDdDgkgsX/M9CCjh5mrg7FfddE4VUcA+0npePp7QQ=;
        b=Nk3EA72aWXVKIDn4xRPCtdiDYaTe92dIrf7BxDlFXffSLutYuJ+uNgKTJEGbWMeBGH
         x6LVKtukvpZk2s6x3AqHxZuTUWlfH55AORRVKWquG8+AOIztrYY6LRRcxYxnUdmhnTfc
         joko8HYZbrp3yg0eqQ8W0fsSA6CLVaOeV7hdQgq4vZwDZhCKwpnypeqR3n/Wgkkc7Qnf
         e2xBccWHSCYZ8qO/v7wMBxRUeEmccGkoEq2Y2Tdw+7jCpsEdMc5bSfRrTqDxY8YA5m+L
         JDLBEMZCT/DD7kzTplwlYQD8l59YwYLPdEqb0wkRwPYMRf+wo38ggkwCICaNACru5BuK
         LMYw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.72.5 with SMTP id z5mr856698vdu.78.1424298511096; Wed, 18
 Feb 2015 14:28:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.179.168 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:28:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAMA5aFaNB0HEjxO763KR2Fy8fN815MPkifmca6dvUBDy2uFkKg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAyV7nGjdguX=4Nt0H=kYnwg8rZ1BkWf8duGZfzheOXXV61pqA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMA5aFaNB0HEjxO763KR2Fy8fN815MPkifmca6dvUBDy2uFkKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:28:31 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPwsocH0mVhpnw7YDoJH-k___MCX00+xhVyCKmxzO8kdM6WLNg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Albert Casademont Filella <albertcasademont@gmail.com>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC-Discuss] Scalar Type Declarations v0.5
From: leight@gmail.com (Leigh)

On 18 February 2015 at 22:21, Albert Casademont Filella
<albertcasademont@gmail.com> wrote:
> So I propose 3 voting options: Yes (strict), Yes (weak), No. The Yes votes
> combined need 2/3 of the votes. Then a simple majority of 50%+1 between the
> different Yes votes is needed.

This is pretty flawed, but nice try.