Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:83049
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.174 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <54E47B63.8010602@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:45:39 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <CAESVnVoZYiMWQk1Ydc-9wbkJo7Ru_4mrUtrubW=Rh=QKK9o8TA@mail.gmail.com> <54E47546.5030800@php.net> <54E477FE.30901@gmail.com> <54E47A06.3010001@php.net>
In-Reply-To: <54E47A06.3010001@php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Scalar Type Hints v0.4
From: rowan.collins@gmail.com (Rowan Collins)

Michael Wallner wrote on 18/02/2015 11:39:
> On 18/02/15 12:31, Rowan Collins wrote:
>> Michael Wallner wrote on 18/02/2015 11:19:
>>> On 17/02/15 23:03, Sara Golemon wrote:
>>>
>>>> 1) Introduce scalar types for primitives: bool, int, float, string,
>>>> resource, object (we already have array)
>>>> 1a) Introduce meta-types as pre-defined unions (we can add custom
>>>> unions in a later rfc).  A possible list may be as follows (again, we
>>>> can argue what's in this list separately):
>>>> * mixed: any type
>>>> * scalar: (null|bool|int|float|string)
>>> Hold on, usually, type checking functions don't identify NULL as scalar.
>> No need for anyone to hold on; as it says in the section you've quoted
>> "we can argue what's in this list separately". Sara's after reactions to
>> the principle of having meta-types/unions in general, not their
>> definitions, right now.
> Did you already incorporate "strict mode" yourself?
> SCNR
>
> I'm not a native speaker, so "hold on" might mean something different to
> you than to me.
>

Sorry, what I meant was, "don't worry, this isn't the kind of issue that 
we need to worry about yet".

Sara's e-mail made clear that these were quick examples, and she wasn't 
expecting feedback on the details at this stage.

Regards,
-- 
Rowan Collins
[IMSoP]