Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:82993 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 14119 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2015 18:05:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Feb 2015 18:05:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=francois@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=francois@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 212.27.42.2 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: francois@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.27.42.2 smtp2-g21.free.fr Received: from [212.27.42.2] ([212.27.42.2:63770] helo=smtp2-g21.free.fr) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C2/98-19463-EC283E45 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:05:03 -0500 Received: from moorea (unknown [82.240.16.115]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43334B0117; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 19:04:42 +0100 (CET) Reply-To: To: "'Tim Bezhashvyly'" , References: <3FCFEC72-64AD-42E3-8512-E3DACDE6FBD7@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3FCFEC72-64AD-42E3-8512-E3DACDE6FBD7@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 19:04:57 +0100 Message-ID: <027301d04adc$3d8855f0$b89901d0$@php.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQGdX4xI4Vkvj7yxG/xqkDs+ng/OYZ1a924g Content-Language: fr X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 150217-1, 17/02/2015), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] RFC Proposal From: francois@php.net (=?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Laupretre?=) Hi Tim, I imagine you're proposing to drop class constants only, not PHP = constants ? If you want to drop PHP constants, stop wasting your time on = this :) While that's the place to discuss it before you start an RFC, the = concept is a little short. Could you give at least syntax examples and, most important, the = migration path you imagine : would you keep supporting current = constants, would you deprecate them, the BC breaks it would introduce... If you don't provide this, none can tell you if it has a chance. Regards Fran=C3=A7ois > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Tim Bezhashvyly [mailto:tim.bezhashvyly@gmail.com] > Envoy=C3=A9 : mardi 17 f=C3=A9vrier 2015 18:35 > =C3=80 : internals@lists.php.net > Objet : [PHP-DEV] RFC Proposal >=20 > Dear PHP internals, >=20 > this is my first RFC proposal and I am not sure if in this email is = supposed to > contain all RFC details or just a brief idea .. which is to drop PHP = constants in > favour of =E2=80=9Cfinal" immutable variables. >=20 > This is basically only a concept but I can also handle its = implementation. >=20 > Please let me know if I have to provide any additional details. >=20 > Regards, > Tim > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php