Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:82956 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 4306 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2015 13:08:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Feb 2015 13:08:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:53911] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id AB/73-19463-83D33E45 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:08:09 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABE3D10C024; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:08:04 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:08:04 +0000 (GMT) X-X-Sender: derick@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl To: Sara Golemon cc: francois@php.net, Philip Sturgeon , Arvids Godjuks , Jefferson Gonzalez , Rowan Collins , PHP internals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <011801d04a07$83ab1c00$8b015400$@php.net> <016f01d04a3a$e9183220$bb489660$@php.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323329-1032068244-1424178485=:5941" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Reviving scalar type hints From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) --8323329-1032068244-1424178485=:5941 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Mon, 16 Feb 2015, Sara Golemon wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Fran=C3=A7ois Laupretre wrote: > > Once again, anyone can take over version 0.3, if it is so great. Why do= n't you do it ? > > I will play the game, stop working on my proposal, and vote 'yes' again= =2E > > But don't ask me to do it in your place. > > > If nobody else does it, I will. Please do! >=20 > I think Andrea's 0.3 proposal was extremely well balanced, served > everyone's needs whether they would admit it or not, and who's only > failing (subjectively termed) was the use of declare(). I think > declare() is fine and not nearly as ugly as some have slandered it to > be, but I'm willing to read the winds and modify it for v0.4. >=20 > Straw poll: These two are my preference: > 3) use strict; (psuedo-namespace) > 4) declare(strict=3Dtrue); (As a top-level declare only) cheers, Derick --8323329-1032068244-1424178485=:5941--