Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:82806 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57777 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2015 10:20:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Feb 2015 10:20:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=francois@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=francois@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 212.27.42.2 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: francois@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.27.42.2 smtp2-g21.free.fr Received: from [212.27.42.2] ([212.27.42.2:27831] helo=smtp2-g21.free.fr) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 19/9C-05176-A64C1E45 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 05:20:27 -0500 Received: from moorea (unknown [82.240.16.115]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382044B0083; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:20:09 +0100 (CET) Reply-To: To: "'Yasuo Ohgaki'" , "'Stanislav Malyshev'" Cc: References: <54E11E84.7050909@pascal-martin.fr> <54E17E0A.1040309@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:20:21 +0100 Message-ID: <00a401d049d2$2c532270$84f96750$@php.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQJ+ofe7NbYD+wUfuD8VHlyWjNBQ+gISPbvPAqPny5ICNaHMNptfAJew Content-Language: fr X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 150216-0, 16/02/2015), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Spaceship operator RFC From: francois@php.net (=?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Laupretre?=) Hi Stas, > De : Stanislav Malyshev > > > Since Andrea has withdrawn the spaceship operator RFC > > (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/combined-comparison-operator), I'd like to > > resurrect it. Looks like by vote results (with 1 day of official = vote > > left) it was clearly passing, so are there any objections to = treating it > > as passed? If not, I'll treat it as such and do the merging as soon = as I > > have time. Reopen it for one day. It's quite crazy but it does not create a = precedent. Andrea said she gave the RFC to anyone wishing to go on with = it. If you officially take over the RFC, you are the owner, you can do = that. Fran=C3=A7ois