Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:82793
Return-Path: <smalyshev@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 30127 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2015 08:46:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 16 Feb 2015 08:46:22 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.44 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.44 mail-wg0-f44.google.com  
Received: from [74.125.82.44] ([74.125.82.44:56318] helo=mail-wg0-f44.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 8B/D7-05176-E5EA1E45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 03:46:22 -0500
Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id k14so18162755wgh.3
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 00:46:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=27KUT0htE3fezza+ItkP0PMwrc+i3Su6a4sdIhttXIg=;
        b=H0QLY4QM4TCYSGVxQtNxyEWYZGqQHsTqsxFQQ7oXTfUX0aYtiTTjKTvppiH+2NO/5d
         88JLwiurk9FOOMa5g3pEG1p9Ip/VA/k1S9t3VvB/SBvDXb22SRqRN3NpImxLgEWENW1y
         mk/q7WO3lOz80wwKvflVkCk8Sa3ONiNUxnKu1pMCFnFPhnae9nu2Go1PzbqcxCYsXgKP
         XYldK1TyRGJuCQPXV+6aGjLtz6+iAC4Jro9QmZiT0iRl389WHOPGj6eZ7IlplR2RV0LC
         anj7f84SnbBaDFqIHNltnpUhhCE/0uc/NLHpSXlmsWS4LoXkHu06DH5B1MXw1U1y0s8J
         46nQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.176.33 with SMTP id cf1mr45813134wjc.19.1424076378515;
        Mon, 16 Feb 2015 00:46:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Stas-Air.local (business-092-079-136-194.static.arcor-ip.net. [92.79.136.194])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d10sm21795480wjn.45.2015.02.16.00.46.16
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Mon, 16 Feb 2015 00:46:17 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54E1AE57.5050807@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:46:15 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Matteo Beccati <php@beccati.com>, internals@lists.php.net
References: <CD0358CC-B891-4093-9566-D9F894D1E3F4@ajf.me> <54E11E84.7050909@pascal-martin.fr> <54E17E0A.1040309@gmail.com> <54E1ADA3.8020101@beccati.com>
In-Reply-To: <54E1ADA3.8020101@beccati.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Spaceship operator RFC
From: smalyshev@gmail.com (Stanislav Malyshev)

Hi!

> About your question, I don't know... treating a cancelled voting result
> as if it wasn't might be setting a weird precedent, even though it was
> so close to the end and had an overwhelming majority.

The only reason it was cancelled because of Andrea quitting, and with
one day left result is pretty clear. Running the same vote again with
4:1 for sounds pointless to me. If it was a close one then fine, but
it's not really close.
If anybody would want to abuse this in the future as a precedent for
gaming the system, we'll deal with it then appropriately, I'm sure.
-- 
Stas Malyshev
smalyshev@gmail.com