Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:82787
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.179 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <54E19C84.2090104@pascal-martin.fr>
References: <8703B53E-2C4A-4AC6-95C4-D4F19C6D5221@ajf.me> <54E19C84.2090104@pascal-martin.fr>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 15:53:47 +0800
Message-ID: <CAEZo+geKKUmL6Yg9EBpsWMb57y1B53cUKwDbpfttURzm4dfSdQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pascal MARTIN, AFUP" <mailing@pascal-martin.fr>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Scalar Type Hints
From: hufeng1987@gmail.com (Netroby)

We do not have Scalar type hints for years. we code in php for years
without any type check. it's ok. not the primary things.

Look at other dynamic programming language, they may not have the type
check either.

It is ok, and it is fine.

Besides php, there be always other choice.

If you really really need type check now. Take a look HHVM.

I guest hacklang will match your need.

If the PHP keep current states, my code will running till the earth dead.
It works like a ancient rock. What ever , i just care my code work or not.
Appreciate your time.
----------------------------
Netroby


2015-02-16 15:30 GMT+08:00 Pascal MARTIN, AFUP <mailing@pascal-martin.fr>:
>
> Le 05/02/2015 21:14, Andrea Faulds a =C3=A9crit :
>>
>> Voting starts today (2015-02-05) and ends in two weeks=E2=80=99 time (20=
15-02-19).
>> In addition to the vote on the main RFC, there is also a vote on the typ=
e
>> aliases issue, and a vote to reserve the type names for future RFCs=E2=
=80=99 sake if
>> this RFC fails.
>>
>> The RFC can be found here, and it contains a voting widget:
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/scalar_type_hints
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Even if this RFC has been withdrawn, I'm posting this here, hoping it mig=
ht
> prove useful if someone ever tries to revive it.
>
> We've discussed this RFC quite a bit with other members of AFUP, and fina=
lly
> ended on the +1 side.
>
> Basically, adding type-hinting for scalars goes towards a PHP that is a b=
it
> more "strict" -- which seems like a good thing for us. But, at the same
> time, the "weak" mode by default means users can choose to go that way at
> their own pace and existing code will keep working, even if calling "stri=
ct"
> libraries.
>
> The biggest concern we've had is the declare() syntax that feels a bit we=
ird
> at first. But that's not enough of a concern for us to be -1 on the RFC a=
s a
> whole.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Pascal MARTIN, AFUP - French UG
> http://php-internals.afup.org/
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>