Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:82654
Return-Path: <leight@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 35100 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2015 00:39:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 14 Feb 2015 00:39:04 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=leight@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=leight@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.181 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: leight@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.181 mail-we0-f181.google.com  
Received: from [74.125.82.181] ([74.125.82.181:33249] helo=mail-we0-f181.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 58/53-15073-6299ED45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:39:04 -0500
Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id w62so19607805wes.12
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:38:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=jGv2i+N6tQbHim23ZZm3qo4EK/qObJ6BiF2fGwqzF0c=;
        b=C841dz/VdLK1ikdWaPH81hzmEQJhJNmVl7Q+onuB3vPHP8Dgg5Dn2Wd5lYeEywJdlD
         FvsJx7wsNYPz+iIn3g9AGi5zaHW0yOAaRE2wdDIozcogjYAUGNFhOxhBJ2imUK4CSkz+
         E9QatKAYRoLp46pOhdl03jkdKbTGJY7QhSNP98gjcSM1QQm/SVAdLZN+K4KHqkdNwFsE
         KakBFxb/Pg+5LdzWNgM0hzZjzPFrIvIlN/AATw6M3xIAopDBvMpskQ+LjSNr0OdbWN38
         +MDG9lR5gMlKJjG2boSV30Htsh8oJVoWt69LNZ5KmoZWpmLcSpXMxGKdTTVQw69wO2E+
         JUBA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.171.136 with SMTP id au8mr24658306wjc.6.1423874338210;
 Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:38:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.50.139 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:38:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <op.xt0ufnm6huszwh@tsukapiou>
References: <CAF+90c-7w1fLqmffYvPRhmtt8rzESEpSmW8vfMD-YfLt1mG_8w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAF+90c8NAROuCDgRajF4AN2oTc4fzmxTjtVC_OAQH=ZFm5N9Uw@mail.gmail.com>
	<op.xt0ufnm6huszwh@tsukapiou>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 00:38:58 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPwsocF7HzW+o_EGm8f=1ruAdM0WqfWJhby_zhq4EE4Zq8nvow@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benoit Schildknecht <bensor987@neuf.fr>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] Exceptions in the engine
From: leight@gmail.com (Leigh)

On 14 February 2015 at 00:32, Benoit Schildknecht <bensor987@neuf.fr> wrote:
> I don't think EngineException should inherit from Exception, it would be
> very dangerous. I'm sure a lot of exceptions are handled like this by a lot
> of devs, without creating custom exceptions :
>

Agreed, EngineException should be a base type of it's own.