Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:82612 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 11511 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2015 13:46:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Feb 2015 13:46:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tpunt@hotmail.co.uk; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tpunt@hotmail.co.uk; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain hotmail.co.uk designates 157.55.2.29 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tpunt@hotmail.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 157.55.2.29 dub004-omc3s20.hotmail.com Received: from [157.55.2.29] ([157.55.2.29:49573] helo=DUB004-OMC3S20.hotmail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 95/19-62214-9100ED45 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:46:03 -0500 Received: from DUB113-W77 ([157.55.2.7]) by DUB004-OMC3S20.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:45:58 -0800 X-TMN: [111kXBhp6skJ9QeQX9x242cDT9LAaZGi] X-Originating-Email: [tpunt@hotmail.co.uk] Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_611c83dd-7d42-48c7-9804-7d79616b2e5d_" To: "francois@tekwire.net" , 'Michael Wallner' , 'Andrea Faulds' CC: "internals@lists.php.net" Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:45:58 +0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <008301d0478b$c060a5d0$4121f170$@tekwire.net> References: <54DDA797.4030501@php.net> <1E15BAAB-C8FC-49A9-B73F-E0E7DEFA208D@ajf.me> <54DDEAB6.1050107@php.net>,<008301d0478b$c060a5d0$4121f170$@tekwire.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Feb 2015 13:45:58.0935 (UTC) FILETIME=[65EA1A70:01D04793] Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [DISCUSSION] Make empty() a Variadic From: tpunt@hotmail.co.uk (Thomas Punt) --_611c83dd-7d42-48c7-9804-7d79616b2e5d_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Francois=2C > From: francois@tekwire.net> > May I suggest to extend your proposal to is_null() with the same logic ? If we were to do the same with is_null()=2C then would it not be best to do= it with all the is_*() functions? I would be more than happy to cater for = those functions as well=2C though their usages seem a lot less common. What= does everyone else think? >=20 > Fran=E7ois Thanks=2C Tom = --_611c83dd-7d42-48c7-9804-7d79616b2e5d_--