Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:82577 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29593 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2015 04:18:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Feb 2015 04:18:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.41 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.41 mail-qa0-f41.google.com Received: from [209.85.216.41] ([209.85.216.41:49673] helo=mail-qa0-f41.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 06/F0-23345-F2B7DD45 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:18:55 -0500 Received: by mail-qa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id x12so10993384qac.0 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:18:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=Husy40mj83e8WPtjhyO5cJ39Yr+m+vaLLX4T3roxSIM=; b=Fe+IA6F+GVuHRtDp06Q9wgxEQb+mxabBEGLdrOBy+X7Wiak0c5dL3sXoqaL5EWYDFS ysI6RZlnnkrohbgKdZ6Zva0HuByg3OGMTa33A3HxapwubQU4dxA/CAecqTvnRgGHeGsh EwhkWudjQ9HaFgG2mNwYcqx7BU3n9c5I4ycY3cWiUzxMB105LchRfHF3QEsolol37+cr NSBgL7xQicXSPYqv+CUqfi2bL/fYRB+BedYEhfqYaFkOX3LxiZ9Ukge0FVkFxbpdz1o5 mK17o3WNADESGPMhbQW8Yz9/c9Jv2vAsoq8uVyS1B9msz3CK4MihhuL+zEq9Z8gKfA0j oRBQ== X-Received: by 10.140.151.13 with SMTP id 13mr1447612qhx.68.1423801133322; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:18:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.198.8 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:18:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <54DC788E.7000000@hoa-project.net> <54DCADFA.6070908@hoa-project.net> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:18:13 +0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ki1iO35kU2oGAEax2TKCtSmw5sw Message-ID: To: marcio3w@gmail.com Cc: "Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa" , PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113553f2c85a3b050ef088e3 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV][RFC][VOTE] Group Use Declarations From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki) --001a113553f2c85a3b050ef088e3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Marcio, I send this because use of array operator has some popularities at least. On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:25 PM, Marcio Almada wrote: > > Yup sure. We are going to vote yes (behind my nickname). > > However, while I agree with all your arguments, we have more syntax and > more semantics, it's kind of confusing. > > But it's a small one, > > so +1 for us. > > I bet there is no way to add such a feature without adding at least a small > amount of syntax, and that's why I aimed for the minimal approach. Also, > there is no better time to have it added other than on a major version > release. I think {} is better than []. Using array operator for this seems a little strange to me. I think this syntax is more like with block, not array. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net --001a113553f2c85a3b050ef088e3--