Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:82564
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: stelian.mocanita@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAG1chopp4WAi5jVbmEAL2EUV8_z5quAB+h1V0ATw4Xxaf_fWHw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOsHV+t=peeRbvXtDoPL2EnvWsQVHNtNYJ5h_e9VQLeLq-srDA@mail.gmail.com>
	<54DC788E.7000000@hoa-project.net>
	<CAOsHV+tcaUZe+siZA7J=Ym2JGyUS7m+z3Q2M6Aav4R=4FssM9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<54DCADFA.6070908@hoa-project.net>
	<CAOsHV+tL4YDr7aiQO2e7COC0rnPvffvOoU4c5n6XkuaWL2QZ5g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAG1chopp4WAi5jVbmEAL2EUV8_z5quAB+h1V0ATw4Xxaf_fWHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:35:56 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMc0WS54Fym9eSWDcjJdRfcVzPs9mvyvct7BOiuDgSvVbERnNw@mail.gmail.com>
To: reeze <reeze@php.net>
Cc: marcio3w@gmail.com, "Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa" <ivan.enderlin@hoa-project.net>, 
	PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11347c5c507807050eebbef7
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV][RFC][VOTE] Group Use Declarations
From: stelianm@php.net (Stelian Mocanita)

--001a11347c5c507807050eebbef7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hello Marcio,

I am inclined to vote no for a couple of reasons:

1. This is not a BC-break, I would move the vote to PHP 7.1. The reasoning
behind this is that the tools in the ecosystem will have a lot of work to
get on par with PHP 7 (talking here about stuff like phpmd, phpcpd, phploc,
newrelic, codeclimate, ides, etc). Since this is not as resonant as the
other changes for 7, I would give those people some breathing room.
2. I am not a big fan of the syntax, I would much more like a python style
syntax (yes, I am aware it requires a new reserver keyword)

What are your thoughts on this?

Stelian

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 3:38 PM, reeze <reeze@php.net> wrote:

> Definitely +1 for me.
> That what I proposed before. you make it happened ;-)
>
> On 12 February 2015 at 22:25, Marcio Almada <marcio.web2@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Yup sure. We are going to vote yes (behind my nickname).
> > > However, while I agree with all your arguments, we have more syntax and
> > more semantics, it's kind of confusing.
> > > But it's a small one,
> > > so +1 for us.
> >
> > I bet there is no way to add such a feature without adding at least a
> small
> > amount of syntax, and that's why I aimed for the minimal approach. Also,
> > there is no better time to have it added other than on a major version
> > release.
> >
> > Thanks for your questions and your vote :)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Reeze Xia
> http://reeze.cn
>

--001a11347c5c507807050eebbef7--