Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:82479 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 31300 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2015 14:24:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Feb 2015 14:24:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ml@anderiasch.de; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ml@anderiasch.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain anderiasch.de designates 81.169.138.148 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ml@anderiasch.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.169.138.148 ares.art-core.org Received: from [81.169.138.148] ([81.169.138.148:60214] helo=ares.art-core.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C4/77-22055-5366BD45 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:24:53 -0500 Received: from parabellum.local (p5093a1a9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.147.161.169]) by ares.art-core.org (mail.art-core.org) with ESMTPSA id 6BF492EE013; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:24:49 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54DB662E.7080107@anderiasch.de> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:24:46 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/36.0a2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lior Kaplan , PHP internals list References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Can we remove "NEWS" tag ? From: ml@anderiasch.de (Florian Anderiasch) On 02/11/2015 10:52 AM, Lior Kaplan wrote: > Hi, > > I've been doing some editing to the NEWS files, and keep getting this > problem > > $ git diff NEWS > fatal: ambiguous argument 'NEWS': both revision and filename > Use '--' to separate filenames from revisions > > Although I can do as it suggests, I would prefer to remove the NEWS tag we > have since 2008 as part of the move from CVS to SVN. > > Any objections ? While I don't think anyone would actually be using that in the near future, can't you just rename it to NEWS-2008 or something? (Or manually retagging and then deleting if nothing else.) * still can be found * no historically important data is lost (just kidding) * problem solved Just because I've seen people argue in favor of keeping historical branches and stuff, and while I don't see a lot of value, it might be needed at some point. ~Florian