Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:82412 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 5352 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2015 03:48:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Feb 2015 03:48:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.175 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.175 mail-qc0-f175.google.com Received: from [209.85.216.175] ([209.85.216.175:35470] helo=mail-qc0-f175.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C0/11-33902-E11DAD45 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:48:47 -0500 Received: by mail-qc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id c9so957552qcz.6 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:48:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=DhECVPHw71uXr+n5pFKuFPLSk8Qe1qWn/PpnNWm1HmM=; b=hZ7PqplDrmHbEvXYni23Qu0gjygXwUHQ76OxoH4+TNyVEdtr6b1fRJ2drBuhddhCqF 70UhypKYNYTcsSEovwCPL31oP98cPj44b5VTc7QvrkrWo/gwOOXz7AVcRwFtQn7M9YbJ pBvN4vGr4VKa7E2ljQgSxz9MHOP+N/27Ong7qlw0q7pKz1Vz1naw6Pv0lIdos5Q0nEFp hcaZDyWLERKSEQAAbgQNDPIhv1l+wRR+W87LR/l1t8/pbVjctyHrsFmi2bw/eZhOUoSb 3wq26cXrCVqKxxdlQ4nQjWbuqsnl291kQDHk2ekEmv36bkZ7SLbZJ4BJA1DDBr48X2cn xcqw== X-Received: by 10.224.38.70 with SMTP id a6mr32667890qae.15.1423626524006; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:48:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.250.195 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:48:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54D9BFDD.70105@beccati.com> References: <54D9BFDD.70105@beccati.com> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:48:03 +0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ayIMHjikjnb_XbmOsaII4h_1XoI Message-ID: To: Matteo Beccati Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2d27441a07a050ec7e127 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][DISCUSSION] Script only includes From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki) --001a11c2d27441a07a050ec7e127 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Matteo, On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Matteo Beccati wrote: > On 10/02/2015 01:52, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > >> Some of you are tired with this topic, but please take a look the RFC >> >> [RFC] Script only includes - this is 3rd version. >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/script_only_include >> >> Please let me know what you like or dislike. >> > > I understand you goal, but ini settings are *bad*. We need less of them, > not more. > > Developing applications or libraries that are resilient to all possible > "variants" in the ini settings is painful. It's a waste of time for both > users and developers trying to provide support. I proposed script()/script_once() at first. Considering new names that might break existing apps, I choose INI. The INI may be removed in the future, if include/require has an option. e.g. require string $filename [, bool $embed_mode_flag]; Would you like me to include this change proposal in the RFC? Even if we have embed_mode_flag, we are better to have the INI option for a while for smooth migration. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net --001a11c2d27441a07a050ec7e127--