Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:82400
Return-Path: <leight@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 80566 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2015 23:36:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 10 Feb 2015 23:36:40 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=leight@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=leight@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.44 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: leight@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.44 mail-wg0-f44.google.com  
Received: from [74.125.82.44] ([74.125.82.44:41301] helo=mail-wg0-f44.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id E8/68-32490-7069AD45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:36:39 -0500
Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id z12so157804wgg.3
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:36:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=mPJiUi1/mOs2dwqIc+HWgME115K5kWWmYZqbyhvTzs0=;
        b=giMpwduZzh8mf0Y5Vi6nV29dXuMQCiL5uyd5zJy6rcnqWzLQ58shxYCJw0XCQld3qc
         8DL9f/pL65TMp/b5vVpa85mubAbAkdJDKa2uo/8Fp6Jh85OTAE3ANH0h90xbcygGnWPs
         36y2YNUjFoatyma7pRXQ/8SiroS8SD+lqjhWZIIScUEZt1k2cKFACGDti4qxdO/4r3+4
         pVXlx5q3AkAUks6GlS8ioqi1GxQjLZSdaR9moFXbf+mrA+zOnfFd/R07cVNo6qL++9Lr
         3EizzjO/kgS1649uQE7imfSEZzCBu7940QzG713AUuZckzZXp5HbcodOxJ11+cw21w+8
         JdaQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.181.9.107 with SMTP id dr11mr379158wid.40.1423611396235;
 Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:36:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.50.139 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:36:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAKxcST9pjp989A+z_yMna-dXU8AGGmqbLEe_TkZ0Jma-V9RtwQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <bc6d032454578020cdd2cef172698534.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com>
	<CAKxcST-HgaLO+EHh0xoxSefK4J3H2d1EMCWHD6z8O69oVL4m8Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJW__o1by7onKL=L1UgZ2O8aR4i3x4mCkxSqbk3o6AKOiufVqQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKxcST9pjp989A+z_yMna-dXU8AGGmqbLEe_TkZ0Jma-V9RtwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:36:36 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPwsocHXW-AdG=m0sHMjgki0+X87hg5aWBHEWj4rZ8iKy-38Cg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Dragoonis <dragoonis@gmail.com>
Cc: Kalle Sommer Nielsen <kalle@php.net>, PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE][RESULT] Removal of dead or not yet PHP7
 ported SAPIs and extensions
From: leight@gmail.com (Leigh)

On 10 February 2015 at 23:29, Paul Dragoonis <dragoonis@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's common sense that if something receives significant resistance then
> there's usually a good reason for it and it shouldn't be ignored regardless
> of how mathematically accurate it may seem to exclude it. Let's keep MSSQL
> in.

https://wiki.php.net/rfc/removal_of_dead_sapis_and_exts#extmssql

Where is the significant resistance?