Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:82377
Return-Path: <lisachenko.it@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 668 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2015 12:30:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 10 Feb 2015 12:30:19 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lisachenko.it@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lisachenko.it@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.177 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lisachenko.it@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.177 mail-we0-f177.google.com  
Received: from [74.125.82.177] ([74.125.82.177:43582] helo=mail-we0-f177.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id F9/48-47508-BD9F9D45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 07:30:19 -0500
Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id l61so33154415wev.8
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 04:30:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=mOlwCdtcsRedJ6F1EbQv+ez6ErVV1Z4uPm+Hn9jjcas=;
        b=zQwlTuSY58l0Al8610yBJsojH6Io6TZIr9hzJGOh8BGy8Yi00erGAIVvpCxbQzImKA
         utkWpode7t4dv8Im37//fa9YL12tlrUd7W90QWALd4BncTKpnrTwPy6qZJtapy/5+EAr
         tR4LnDkUnoXlnbbjhc7woUiaCNKBDl7BrDPONadCKOzIhUpMCJz6TP4W3CdO9pZ7DEJ1
         kE0yCz9b0ArL9ojkg5EMFaHEQOvkYJLPtjeFz6FFAUc8zglSzd3R1gHZ/QjurpXMEjWw
         D/D6l0njmyKnkwqIt8clx9Wk9uhQd2n6nKjwvHSfu4YRsIvV1KoRiA64lMNdIE09cqoM
         7LJA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.71.110 with SMTP id t14mr48577155wju.58.1423571415814;
 Tue, 10 Feb 2015 04:30:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.154.229 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 04:30:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CA+9eiLti99R-e4EU-52ZyaNVVFgt-zbvLB_=ns=sKLMQECQoyg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9eiLuNjTa8JzBgnZE5iuv5BZ4Kw4Ehk1ivxPUetNSmZ43JMw@mail.gmail.com>
	<54D7ED22.3080001@gmail.com>
	<CA+9eiLvn7BzfG5N+5Oca8pVO1OTzN9=jWof6NrVDfxvvu-XqPA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL=_i_m78Zo5euReKsvFfrLknFq7KEzoNnrrBefC987u+=+yHQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+9eiLuUFiKwOR-BqQEmkQirpAMxgb0GE70Zz7h4WDsd1Me8FQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGa2bXYDvdvRLiOpDk8EnvE00JE4x47SXB9fET4uO2Er_F6s_w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL=_i_=mGc_0u0YDCQ7Jiqn_ggyJmQSd_mk_snf7ArDpDXO53A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+9eiLur0DVGBNkzFkiTj3POL5B9H0D8=5wE-wuwN2O-FQZNyg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL=_i_m=XDKtc2iCSjoquaHkmX862gyMweKS5Xw4AS--oLj19w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+9eiLsX=mOOgXmNBKD1L6WKx2=Vy81mThaKa1XCjjAw6R=2vA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGa2bXYYp0WQmnTnbsHXzc8XGG0PxOVHu7XvwiMCSJiUWoKeCg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGa2bXbKs8cGRTQ1sfeRonnmVXtp7ftVDkz_ALmqr8OnczQxCg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGa2bXZ8Wy7bUYgtbajr+GkpQtQEjQLMbFT2mSB5OEnLO2mgfg@mail.gmail.com>
	<54D9DE4B.7030509@lsces.co.uk>
	<CAEbg-4YTkJXMYdMpUXTRfs4R7V27NdgzynVRhWq_M3i1Wa=_WA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+9eiLti99R-e4EU-52ZyaNVVFgt-zbvLB_=ns=sKLMQECQoyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:30:15 +0300
Message-ID: <CAEbg-4YvEyodvjfr45-jrMSBpE9_5b8Pofyz1zx4p-F-An2B1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>
Cc: Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk>, PHP internals list <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfd0bd68d58eb050ebb0ccc
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Design by Contract
From: lisachenko.it@gmail.com (Alexander Lisachenko)

--047d7bfd0bd68d58eb050ebb0ccc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

2015-02-10 15:20 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>:

> I thought about this way, and you are welcome to start composing another
> RFC. it makes sense and has its advantages.
> Unfortunately, it relays on many unavailable features that has to be
> designed as well (annotations, AST manipulation, opcode manipulation), but
> may be this is a right road.
>


Thanks, Dmitry! Your position is clearly highlight my vision, it's not so
easy, but maybe it will bring us much more profit at the end.


2015-02-10 15:20 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>:

> D and Effiel approach may work as well, but if you like another
> (annotation based) approach - be involved into development.
> At first we'll need 3-rd RFC that defines all the things that must be
> implemented.
> I may help, with RFC, design and implementation.
>

Thanks, your help is really appreciated ) I'l try to start another one RFC
about this API, let's have a look what can be done.

--047d7bfd0bd68d58eb050ebb0ccc--