Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:82285 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 58381 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2015 14:50:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Feb 2015 14:50:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.179 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.179 mail-qc0-f179.google.com Received: from [209.85.216.179] ([209.85.216.179:51354] helo=mail-qc0-f179.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 39/05-50460-C29C8D45 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:50:22 -0500 Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id r5so1269643qcx.10 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 06:50:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=V+u7sSq4jsaH0kjYrWrcEuAbNsmHVEzTVPqvjLc1UC0=; b=pu9Xr62PGKOZul78ohWagG6ByTYtYxK11OPr7EtN8eKpj+PCDsotGCNBbgY03oWjXM 5bafFMpV/VsuoldY4TCiDNYlzSxeoj7pft14yqZWPPPoTXQdw9XxVQ7Rt0cIqKVv2MpK qiZMSdb4APiKZQjFKRVi/fuJCjNX49gf/jvTSUbqN0O6pvRnM97+VE5UhIkD9stzvLSB +WHrVK72Ii6hXfZRn9SHXIE8OWvmIOX4HD+agXcQISfiSv5bqFdI5zTFU3OcuMY98QaY ozKFXr7wSZXRBcuKNfeiInNi80T2azQRE4G71Q+XeN+KnAX0LYeI7x/xnrNDg6BMdeaW HD1w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.171.67 with SMTP id g3mr34762326qaz.17.1423493415468; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 06:50:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.185.37 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 06:50:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.185.37 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 06:50:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54D8BB76.1080801@php.net> References: <8703B53E-2C4A-4AC6-95C4-D4F19C6D5221@ajf.me> <54D5659D.5000602@php.net> <54D8BB76.1080801@php.net> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:50:13 +0700 Message-ID: To: Sebastian Bergmann Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6776885e8526050ea8e393 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Scalar Type Hints From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) --047d7b6776885e8526050ea8e393 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Feb 9, 2015 8:52 PM, "Sebastian Bergmann" wrote: > > Am 07.02.2015 um 02:08 schrieb Sebastian Bergmann: > > After reading your email, Nikita, I deleted my vote (it was no before). > > I will review the RFC again, with your arguments (and others) in mind > > and maybe I'll come to a different conclusion. > > I have voted (no) again. > > I still think that if we add support for scalars in type declarations > then the corresponding check must be strict. But since that strictness > does not align with the spirit of PHP I much rather have no support > for scalars than one that is not strict. Not strict? You loose me here. --047d7b6776885e8526050ea8e393--