Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:82266 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 20667 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2015 11:07:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Feb 2015 11:07:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=francois@tekwire.net; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=francois@tekwire.net; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain tekwire.net does not designate 212.27.42.2 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: francois@tekwire.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.27.42.2 smtp2-g21.free.fr Received: from [212.27.42.2] ([212.27.42.2:43686] helo=smtp2-g21.free.fr) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E6/0E-50460-7F498D45 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 06:07:35 -0500 Received: from moorea (unknown [82.240.16.115]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D1A4B02AE; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 12:04:03 +0100 (CET) Reply-To: To: "'Pierre Joye'" , "'Yasuo Ohgaki'" Cc: "'PHP internals'" , "'Matt Parker'" References: In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 12:07:31 +0100 Message-ID: <04a501d04458$99d35880$cd7a0980$@tekwire.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQJZvA+N8UFYNjpSuUI3STN1zjMFOgL03mkEAnkDhZebqcgVEA== Content-Language: fr X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 150208-1, 08/02/2015), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] scalar type hints From: francois@tekwire.net (=?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Laupretre?=) > De : Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre.php@gmail.com] > > > However, DbC is coming close! > > > > DbC brings much more flexibility, strict/loose constraints, = performance, > > security, better documentation and more. > > DbC suitable for weakly typed PHP perfectly. > > > > Therefore, I'm holding my vote now. > > I hope everyone have an attention to DbC and consider thoughtfully. >=20 > Imho they are totally different things. You're right. That's two different things in the way they are = implemented. But they are also closely related because both approaches = propose an element of solution to similar needs: reduce coding errors. Then, depending on their own position about strict types, people will = consider it as just a complement, or as a whole alternative. I agree on = one thing, we mustn't mix both discussions :) Cheers Fran=C3=A7ois