Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:82206 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 5322 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2015 00:47:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Feb 2015 00:47:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=narf@devilix.net; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=narf@devilix.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain devilix.net designates 209.85.218.48 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: narf@devilix.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.218.48 mail-oi0-f48.google.com Received: from [209.85.218.48] ([209.85.218.48:63516] helo=mail-oi0-f48.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 3D/CF-26926-AB308D45 for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 19:47:55 -0500 Received: by mail-oi0-f48.google.com with SMTP id a3so1748811oib.7 for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 16:47:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=devilix.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=QsxsNNbAjl5EI8UUwzhgEA8wmqM9CKXrnJE4bh2zmtc=; b=n6tfR+nJKfA3WQ4Ec+8722wsZOw3Qf/i8ZLxDCaBmTCLmXqFWQgwj3fLzOx8eZJA/O +L2OQ/VRewudwGixdyr8MUltc3Nlj4YGvKvmeRguu52GO6t2VW/z819AMOAI1BDecpV8 8nd23QZlWOi/vqFTHIYDCBD3TBqVB33ZN3ZpA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=QsxsNNbAjl5EI8UUwzhgEA8wmqM9CKXrnJE4bh2zmtc=; b=Qj8rLMfVAhuhD1z6grQB+EcyNEXkAGEkzl9yQ5TJtS4edi2pq2oHAN8Sw5F0HE4vXx fYFcKHuIalE5aeLJJNLthDO5uuNBQ5R266qG70EKsXk2TuUSj/nIk4WE5idPYVAFfZyy hu7gVCpeic/+e+n0c2mYm7s3DqQ3yOKlEPgd9TkxU+IcR5Zvv/vzeEQk1G1P6cMKgWSm eWYDpb2aD+7hKMdKOZIE/NJZuiRioNqtVO1MKYhxwIafkN/w1Xw/Pe9P7aqBGrlo5X+5 3GllmGdFW1HxhmmSPsswlVFQSBhtLKd8XtJZFwpw+CshpWMn8ie5egYLGj0khJbQV8LU Xk2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmnFctkQNF+nKPioAq7UaBpcF0EC3Ig00pa5Ti81Jp2cVuqcQQOxLrGSNSB8OvpV3SVASho MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.83.11 with SMTP id h11mr2136311oib.97.1423442871687; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 16:47:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.214.205 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 16:47:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <8703B53E-2C4A-4AC6-95C4-D4F19C6D5221@ajf.me> <54D5659D.5000602@php.net> <54D7A6DB.3050209@seld.be> <74136F1E-817F-4A33-8228-B47045DD65C3@ajf.me> <54D7EB44.9010005@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 02:47:51 +0200 Message-ID: To: Pierre Joye Cc: Zeev Suraski , Andrea Faulds , Stanislav Malyshev , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Scalar Type Hints From: narf@devilix.net (Andrey Andreev) Hi, On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > There is a vote, you do not like the RFC or part of > it, vote no. But this constant attempt to get exactly what you want > and do almost everything possible to get it is getting very counter > productive. I want to note that this should count for both sides. Any time that somebody states that they don't like the RFC, there are at least two people trying to convince that person that it is good and they should support it. This is ... annoying, to say the least. Please just let the voters decide on their own. Cheers, Andrey.