Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:82187 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 74743 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2015 23:03:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Feb 2015 23:03:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.41 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.41 mail-pa0-f41.google.com Received: from [209.85.220.41] ([209.85.220.41:47716] helo=mail-pa0-f41.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1E/59-26926-A5BE7D45 for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 18:03:54 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id kx10so5292921pab.0 for ; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 15:03:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I3WGAGXgCIyqQMYHClflcOtmf0rFBQkDpjODKPxbOWw=; b=MuuAW8aXdUXKUbkL7iNQHTwIh0R2IHjrggoAsXhWNY3JI4x/biUV/f8xEnXyRtDxXP krLetna1W7rcE3qMMqC2fos/EzJihz7NI7XjPDOyT9dPcFHpWlBe61PDA7+Y6w5zekLY gc9UG0RjirD9AWYMT65uDYtYI1hKNJ24g8EtnuS0Tdr7h5Ur+vx1CN/DqFdb/v6j3WEQ OGaI8n2+cP/rYLsqvT9bS2VY0ynpOxLF1/VJUBXN6OFADHlRNW4LIm0vB5B721pawxY0 P2LduSF9fAetL2uO09NAtrFOuiOlh/nanPdZ8hujJeNOwa5Prw94mgUeUtF/+IxgR7Ti MgIQ== X-Received: by 10.66.157.5 with SMTP id wi5mr23406058pab.37.1423436631083; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 15:03:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from Stas-Air.local (108-66-6-48.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [108.66.6.48]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s4sm14356940pdd.40.2015.02.08.15.03.49 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 08 Feb 2015 15:03:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54D7EB44.9010005@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 15:03:32 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrea Faulds , Zeev Suraski CC: Jordi Boggiano , internals@lists.php.net References: <8703B53E-2C4A-4AC6-95C4-D4F19C6D5221@ajf.me> <54D5659D.5000602@php.net> <54D7A6DB.3050209@seld.be> <74136F1E-817F-4A33-8228-B47045DD65C3@ajf.me> In-Reply-To: <74136F1E-817F-4A33-8228-B47045DD65C3@ajf.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Scalar Type Hints From: smalyshev@gmail.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! >> Last, voters should take into account that this isn't an 'either this RFC or >> nothing' situation. I think it's very unfortunate that the original RFC - >> that had zero controversy surrounding it - was never put to a vote. > > Please stop repeating this, it is blatantly false and I’ve pointed this out several times. How is it false? Did we have a vote on v1? What was the result of the vote? -- Stas Malyshev smalyshev@gmail.com