Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:82034 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 17785 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2015 09:55:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Feb 2015 09:55:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=francois@tekwire.net; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=francois@tekwire.net; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain tekwire.net does not designate 212.27.42.2 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: francois@tekwire.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.27.42.2 smtp2-g21.free.fr Received: from [212.27.42.2] ([212.27.42.2:44428] helo=smtp2-g21.free.fr) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id AD/4E-45146-D9F84D45 for ; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 04:55:41 -0500 Received: from moorea (unknown [82.240.16.115]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136934B0257; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:52:16 +0100 (CET) Reply-To: To: "'Yasuo Ohgaki'" , "'Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa'" Cc: References: <54D37D41.2030706@hoa-project.net> <54D470FA.6000303@hoa-project.net> In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:55:31 +0100 Message-ID: <02d301d041f3$0c5f3990$251dacb0$@tekwire.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQGgxP9HPTh52uHWkGo6jLSeXRdtNAG/QBJNAaMNlcwCFsMP6wB6oLwcnRK8V8A= Content-Language: fr X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 150205-1, 05/02/2015), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Design by Contract From: francois@tekwire.net (=?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Laupretre?=) Hi Yasuo, > De : yohgaki@gmail.com [mailto:yohgaki@gmail.com] De la part de Yasuo = Ohgaki > Do you think of any negative impact on PHP if we implement D like > in{}/out{} which allow any PHP syntax? Can you please give your opinion about the BC break a D-like syntax = would introduce ? It is important because, if the community accepts such = a BC break for PHP 7, I stop working on my proposal based on phpdoc = comments. IMO, it is essential to offer DbC option without making the = 'DbC-enabled' code unable to run on PHP 5, but that's just my opinion. Cheers Fran=C3=A7ois