Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:82010
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.51 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFp73XsMVru-+Tpi3Y11jD=dTdZLETfOPMkwbuJpYqfByYg0pA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9eiLuNjTa8JzBgnZE5iuv5BZ4Kw4Ehk1ivxPUetNSmZ43JMw@mail.gmail.com>
	<01d601d04146$6fbda4c0$4f38ee40$@tekwire.net>
	<CA+9eiLvQroYuUW_dVr+r5c=O=1aQ3upfahVUd1e-9qpLQRrxUw@mail.gmail.com>
	<020c01d0414b$2c3a1120$84ae3360$@tekwire.net>
	<CAEZPtU41ud0JSzfc6axnzdKCNJ48-LBCx=zuiFVpQ1mNdTK-kA@mail.gmail.com>
	<022801d0415a$027e0620$077a1260$@tekwire.net>
	<CA+9eiLtThKhB13=1O8iRgWXKkOZ0ZxAaz-0P69dnN_ngOOJtTA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU7wOGBjfNES1cZHb-t6AUGX=-t1STpHR8D=b9bX1yMbSw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFp73XsPEG8RzHjyT-f6N7Ea26rXg1rczibFEdq7MQomFjK+Ew@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU6TfYBEb5s5T+xEuB0b8vy79FpJXqs=sRX64YcVYn6kTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFp73XsMVru-+Tpi3Y11jD=dTdZLETfOPMkwbuJpYqfByYg0pA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 11:23:00 +0700
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU5kJzZrQvP6tWxy=zHUAhcka2buEYpyWmkvvptE2ZvVvg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "guilhermeblanco@gmail.com" <guilhermeblanco@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>, =?UTF-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Laupretre?= <francois@tekwire.net>, 
	Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Design by Contract
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:14 AM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com
<guilhermeblanco@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> Sorry, but you don't. Proposing a simple syntax is the same as not proposing
> it.
> We can do whatever syntax is proposed, but we need to discuss on how to
> handle inheritance, overriding, etc.
> None ever discussed that. 2010's patch handled all that nicely. I do
> remember however Dmitry had a suggestion to optimize the overall storage of
> annotation values, but it got lost in time. I somehow remember he wanted to
> store a cached version of reflection class into the class entry and expose
> as Class::CLASS or something... I saw this written in another place too...
> it got slightly changed over time and we now have it return only its FQCN.

Benjamin proposed it and I think it is a good compromise, it can then
evolve if necessary or desired.