Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:82008
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.177 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEZPtU6TfYBEb5s5T+xEuB0b8vy79FpJXqs=sRX64YcVYn6kTg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9eiLuNjTa8JzBgnZE5iuv5BZ4Kw4Ehk1ivxPUetNSmZ43JMw@mail.gmail.com>
 <01d601d04146$6fbda4c0$4f38ee40$@tekwire.net> <CA+9eiLvQroYuUW_dVr+r5c=O=1aQ3upfahVUd1e-9qpLQRrxUw@mail.gmail.com>
 <020c01d0414b$2c3a1120$84ae3360$@tekwire.net> <CAEZPtU41ud0JSzfc6axnzdKCNJ48-LBCx=zuiFVpQ1mNdTK-kA@mail.gmail.com>
 <022801d0415a$027e0620$077a1260$@tekwire.net> <CA+9eiLtThKhB13=1O8iRgWXKkOZ0ZxAaz-0P69dnN_ngOOJtTA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEZPtU7wOGBjfNES1cZHb-t6AUGX=-t1STpHR8D=b9bX1yMbSw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFp73XsPEG8RzHjyT-f6N7Ea26rXg1rczibFEdq7MQomFjK+Ew@mail.gmail.com> <CAEZPtU6TfYBEb5s5T+xEuB0b8vy79FpJXqs=sRX64YcVYn6kTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 23:14:20 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFp73XsMVru-+Tpi3Y11jD=dTdZLETfOPMkwbuJpYqfByYg0pA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>, =?UTF-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Laupretre?= <francois@tekwire.net>, 
	Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b414162e87ffd050e63a89d
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Design by Contract
From: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com ("guilhermeblanco@gmail.com")

--047d7b414162e87ffd050e63a89d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Pierre,

Sorry, but you don't. Proposing a simple syntax is the same as not
proposing it.
We can do whatever syntax is proposed, but we need to discuss on how to
handle inheritance, overriding, etc.
None ever discussed that. 2010's patch handled all that nicely. I do
remember however Dmitry had a suggestion to optimize the overall storage of
annotation values, but it got lost in time. I somehow remember he wanted to
store a cached version of reflection class into the class entry and expose
as Class::CLASS or something... I saw this written in another place too...
it got slightly changed over time and we now have it return only its FQCN.

[]s,


On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:08 AM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com
> <guilhermeblanco@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I already said before and I'm happy to say it again...
> > Whenever you feel ready to get true, complete Annotations into core, just
> > tell me and I'll be ready to work on previously suggested Annotations in
> > sync with current internals.
>
> We are, with the simplified syntax we discussed last time (have to dig
> the archive)
>
> > Cheers,
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote:
> >> > phpdoc is annotation as well, but to split it into specific attributes
> >> > we
> >> > have to write specialized parsers.
> >> > Other languages support annotation or attributes that may be used more
> >> > easily.
> >> >
> >> > http://docs.hhvm.com/manual/en/hack.attributes.php
> >>
> >> Exactly, phpdoc is used as annotation (or comments with some similar
> >> syntax) but is definitively not aimed to be annotations.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Pierre
> >>
> >> @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org
> >>
> >> --
> >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Guilherme Blanco
> > MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
> > GTalk: guilhermeblanco
> > Toronto - ON/Canada
>
>
>
> --
> Pierre
>
> @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org
>



-- 
Guilherme Blanco
MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
GTalk: guilhermeblanco
Toronto - ON/Canada

--047d7b414162e87ffd050e63a89d--