Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:81874
Return-Path: <leight@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 96539 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2015 08:31:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 5 Feb 2015 08:31:42 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=leight@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=leight@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.181 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: leight@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.181 mail-wi0-f181.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.212.181] ([209.85.212.181:49495] helo=mail-wi0-f181.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 6E/67-51979-D6A23D45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 03:31:41 -0500
Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id fb4so8829439wid.2
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 00:31:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=9CD/ttvEw13Cgb7p4k9kKOIy69+kYR1FpJK3REEaNGk=;
        b=aWfGRlqwLpt7nYPfow4YvEAFTVnBGEt8tEiJuFsIT7ZlFNsQ2Zv4/2D/iwEy97tRDG
         L4QoQPB/TOnD6AJ94U3UAJgwzK1y4UTUZlmRoFaqyPq2/LFzKikinLWt88/i3Nh54kYP
         0/cNu9IuHWGn76U8MLr50qQGfigfGmfSuR0dpnoQh7BBH8gR+8Kzl/4PAuKiF5JbcNRH
         SRcwKIcotycAnjCE7WVF6jFQOsUV4YTKGiOY13kkU8m5dsb8CsRR4756lSJ2U0m3PB7m
         74+n9arotPVqqkyVkLd8w4gknrojU1oARIVIGVrkNeCCac/GlIKxSwWe5VSWXl9Eo/aT
         2qVw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.209.228 with SMTP id mp4mr1963552wjc.36.1423125098837;
 Thu, 05 Feb 2015 00:31:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.50.139 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 00:31:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CADajX4CHHdSpUfLfjhwrtdzmJfg9di4FpfeVEzBG4P7K7B+e0w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGa2bXZMxxXBOQ=NdbNtzgrjjvdomV8zOr+Z4zASZU4+JHmqyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGa2bXbf=hzbZ9eH6JVnMM0+6OeTQvAoqBe44g8qxFAAr9u9Kw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAG1choq8S_EkdS22SFO+443u_LYVB-Z-b2ra6RK8sDhrJKc-VQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGa2bXbJyK=2GCmGDw7PAh0ib=EL9GO7FFGf0X6VyAWqfR8EAA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADajX4CHHdSpUfLfjhwrtdzmJfg9di4FpfeVEzBG4P7K7B+e0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 08:31:38 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPwsocGh_-SYiWceEg=5go8G1bUs+CWUBb9uv_2Oh7AZhBxd8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Harvey <aharvey@php.net>
Cc: Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>, reeze <reeze@php.net>, 
	"internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][DISCUSSION] script() and script_once()
From: leight@gmail.com (Leigh)

On 5 February 2015 at 05:37, Adam Harvey <aharvey@php.net> wrote:
> I'm not totally clear on what this RFC is proposing, honestly. Is the
> new script statement meant to only include files that are entirely
> wrapped in <?php and ?> tags? Are files included that way assumed to
> be PHP and don't require <?php and ?> tags? Something else?
>

This is my initial reaction to the RFC, it doesn't state the
_specific_ difference between include/script. I understand what was
proposed in the nophptags RFC, but I have to make an assumption for
this RFC.

My assumption is that you want script* to not require <?php to begin
parsing. i.e. including /etc/passwd would be a parse failure.