Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:81861
Return-Path: <yohgaki@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 66193 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2015 05:07:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 5 Feb 2015 05:07:30 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.50 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.50 mail-qg0-f50.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.192.50] ([209.85.192.50:64832] helo=mail-qg0-f50.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 3F/C1-51979-09AF2D45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 00:07:29 -0500
Received: by mail-qg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id j5so4733457qga.9
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 21:07:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=s5/rrUUCqOO/G6em0yruDqnPZcXlZkwU6u2Uy6TUvG0=;
        b=ZYKhoDEdDbNieXclZ5PJxN2+tNyriGJ/AoRD5JMFJpMo8W8gxZmcJeWZCDVot40c9p
         2fp0mpgP4tPigjq0+Mg4S996us/O0+LjMYTtEOU52EKTC4WzCGK5qegxY6wVJt5CW4Qk
         Qwq7ixkRMIe6hRn1qbUqN3kFmqPW9crcDflu8p3vWKMICI3hfHp1aHOWKfzDDNfo+tSG
         Aq2TNTChYOcTWf0Jnt4NoFCejEK8eI6vj85ISZpWJWWe2cfdJVnu24BjKsv8/NMKn8pc
         HrWB1wNfvdcbjiIQS1yzayLOqQnUc7ay59/xRgbxwQkfjoaM4V1FSC6x1Kz0IVwcKK5H
         W3ww==
X-Received: by 10.229.192.5 with SMTP id do5mr4738416qcb.12.1423112845882;
 Wed, 04 Feb 2015 21:07:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
Received: by 10.229.28.72 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 21:06:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAG1choq8S_EkdS22SFO+443u_LYVB-Z-b2ra6RK8sDhrJKc-VQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGa2bXZMxxXBOQ=NdbNtzgrjjvdomV8zOr+Z4zASZU4+JHmqyw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXbf=hzbZ9eH6JVnMM0+6OeTQvAoqBe44g8qxFAAr9u9Kw@mail.gmail.com> <CAG1choq8S_EkdS22SFO+443u_LYVB-Z-b2ra6RK8sDhrJKc-VQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:06:45 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: YWJJCRI9tIg5iJBvPlzre_OQy9M
Message-ID: <CAGa2bXbJyK=2GCmGDw7PAh0ib=EL9GO7FFGf0X6VyAWqfR8EAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: reeze <reeze@php.net>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11337bfca77b51050e5047e4
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][DISCUSSION] script() and script_once()
From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki)

--001a11337bfca77b51050e5047e4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Reeze,

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 1:38 PM, reeze <reeze@php.net> wrote:

> The name seems ambiguous , how about "require_script/once" to match
> "do_sth" pattern?


I thought so at first, too.
How about alternative way that turn 'require' into non embedded mode by INI
switch?

> Since script()/script_once() is almost copy of require()/require_once(),
it could be
> INI option.
>
> require_embed = On/Off

Almost all users use 'require' only for script today, I guess.
I should have included this option in RFC. I'll do that now.

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net

--001a11337bfca77b51050e5047e4--