Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:81828
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain devilix.net designates 209.85.214.182 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1E80FCAC-6EEB-426C-97D2-B6813BA1460C@ajf.me>
References: <DDA98D4F-2105-415A-B921-01A622091FA9@php.net>
	<54D217E7.8030407@php.net>
	<CAB6YZuxfpTMRu_y_VL8gQqXdf+TH+LAap_8B-_EqMBy1epLg_Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<54D21BEB.2040704@php.net>
	<CAEZPtU6u4jVVu_z4nkPKgTSBB4Njyx0ghiCc=goqr_47EE9ftQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<54D2527F.8020809@googlemail.com>
	<D1373589-D867-4091-8170-A7798D18DF94@ajf.me>
	<CAPhkiZwc=6rhaZ5FnRDXMR8VB+pJbeGv4j4-svzFHOZ5FSiYTw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1E80FCAC-6EEB-426C-97D2-B6813BA1460C@ajf.me>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 19:33:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPhkiZxTgkWQkA8cs5EUYfJW+k0VA8XN77Twp2HinT61ZLO05Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>
Cc: Crypto Compress <cryptocompress@googlemail.com>, 
	PHP Developers Mailing List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] pecl_http
From: narf@devilix.net (Andrey Andreev)

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote:
> Hey,
>
>> On 4 Feb 2015, at 17:23, Andrey Andreev <narf@devilix.net> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure about namespacing it in the first place, but otherwise I
>> agree with you - acronyms should be capitalised.
>
> What=E2=80=99s your objection? We either namespace it, or we have to add =
some weird prefix to avoid conflicts. I=E2=80=99d rather we not have the pr=
efix.
>
> The global namespace is already plenty polluted. Sure, most extensions so=
 far don=E2=80=99t use namespaces, but that=E2=80=99s because they were wri=
tten before 5.3 came out. I think it=E2=80=99s time to move on. Users know =
what namespaces are now, I don=E2=80=99t think it=E2=80=99d cause problems.
>

I'm not objecting it really, just haven't had a detailed look at it
yet and so far there's no core/bundled extension that is namespaced
(the ever-present "consistency" argument ... *cough*).

Cheers,
Andrey.