Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:81827 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 50759 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2015 17:26:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Feb 2015 17:26:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 192.64.116.199 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.64.116.199 imap11-2.ox.privateemail.com Received: from [192.64.116.199] ([192.64.116.199:49483] helo=imap11-2.ox.privateemail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 03/02-40930-05652D45 for ; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 12:26:40 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12078800F1; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 12:26:37 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap11.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap11.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id A7F4rpCoKmYD; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 12:26:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from oa-res-26-240.wireless.abdn.ac.uk (oa-res-26-240.wireless.abdn.ac.uk [137.50.26.240]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08C688800EC; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 12:26:36 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:26:34 +0000 Cc: Crypto Compress , PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <1E80FCAC-6EEB-426C-97D2-B6813BA1460C@ajf.me> References: <54D217E7.8030407@php.net> <54D21BEB.2040704@php.net> <54D2527F.8020809@googlemail.com> To: Andrey Andreev X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] pecl_http From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) Hey, > On 4 Feb 2015, at 17:23, Andrey Andreev wrote: >=20 > I'm not sure about namespacing it in the first place, but otherwise I > agree with you - acronyms should be capitalised. What=E2=80=99s your objection? We either namespace it, or we have to add = some weird prefix to avoid conflicts. I=E2=80=99d rather we not have the = prefix. The global namespace is already plenty polluted. Sure, most extensions = so far don=E2=80=99t use namespaces, but that=E2=80=99s because they = were written before 5.3 came out. I think it=E2=80=99s time to move on. = Users know what namespaces are now, I don=E2=80=99t think it=E2=80=99d = cause problems. Thanks. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/