Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:81825
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain devilix.net designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D1373589-D867-4091-8170-A7798D18DF94@ajf.me>
References: <DDA98D4F-2105-415A-B921-01A622091FA9@php.net>
	<54D217E7.8030407@php.net>
	<CAB6YZuxfpTMRu_y_VL8gQqXdf+TH+LAap_8B-_EqMBy1epLg_Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<54D21BEB.2040704@php.net>
	<CAEZPtU6u4jVVu_z4nkPKgTSBB4Njyx0ghiCc=goqr_47EE9ftQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<54D2527F.8020809@googlemail.com>
	<D1373589-D867-4091-8170-A7798D18DF94@ajf.me>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 19:23:41 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPhkiZwc=6rhaZ5FnRDXMR8VB+pJbeGv4j4-svzFHOZ5FSiYTw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>
Cc: Crypto Compress <cryptocompress@googlemail.com>, 
	PHP Developers Mailing List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] pecl_http
From: narf@devilix.net (Andrey Andreev)

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote:
> Hey,
>
>> On 4 Feb 2015, at 17:10, Crypto Compress <cryptocompress@googlemail.com>=
 wrote:
>>
>>> I would go with Http\
>>
>> Why not the reserved Php\Http\?
>
> This sounds good to me. php\ is already reserved, and it=E2=80=99s simila=
r to the common community convention of vendor\packagename. (e.g. ajf\escap=
es.) Would work well with Composer and Packagist too, as it could be a virt=
ual php/http package (Packagist naming convention).
>
> Also, I=E2=80=99d like to say I=E2=80=99d prefer php\HTTP or php\http ove=
r php\Http. Capitalising an acronym doesn=E2=80=99t feel right to me, perha=
ps because case is usually significant, Following the Casing Rules Used by =
Titles. Of php\HTTP and php\http, php\http is probably better since the cas=
e matches that of php\. It could also be PHP\HTTP, I guess, but lowercase i=
s somehow more appealing to me.
>
> Thoughts?

I'm not sure about namespacing it in the first place, but otherwise I
agree with you - acronyms should be capitalised.

Some <put a popular styleguide here> nazis probably won't agree, but
capitalising only the first letter of an acronym does feel really
weird.

Cheers,
Andrey.