Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:81824 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 46192 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2015 17:17:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Feb 2015 17:17:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 192.64.116.216 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.64.116.216 imap10-3.ox.privateemail.com Received: from [192.64.116.216] ([192.64.116.216:49649] helo=imap10-3.ox.privateemail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6C/F0-40930-22452D45 for ; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 12:17:24 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26BE2400DE; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 12:17:18 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap10.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap10.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id WUCe9YyQQBVY; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 12:17:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from oa-res-26-240.wireless.abdn.ac.uk (oa-res-26-240.wireless.abdn.ac.uk [137.50.26.240]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C6D22400C7; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 12:17:18 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) In-Reply-To: <54D2527F.8020809@googlemail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:17:16 +0000 Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <54D217E7.8030407@php.net> <54D21BEB.2040704@php.net> <54D2527F.8020809@googlemail.com> To: Crypto Compress X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] pecl_http From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) Hey, > On 4 Feb 2015, at 17:10, Crypto Compress = wrote: >=20 >> I would go with Http\ >=20 > Why not the reserved Php\Http\? This sounds good to me. php\ is already reserved, and it=E2=80=99s = similar to the common community convention of vendor\packagename. (e.g. = ajf\escapes.) Would work well with Composer and Packagist too, as it = could be a virtual php/http package (Packagist naming convention). Also, I=E2=80=99d like to say I=E2=80=99d prefer php\HTTP or php\http = over php\Http. Capitalising an acronym doesn=E2=80=99t feel right to me, = perhaps because case is usually significant, Following the Casing Rules = Used by Titles. Of php\HTTP and php\http, php\http is probably better = since the case matches that of php\. It could also be PHP\HTTP, I guess, = but lowercase is somehow more appealing to me. Thoughts? -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/