Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:81803 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 91669 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2015 10:23:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Feb 2015 10:23:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=anatol.php@belski.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=anatol.php@belski.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain belski.net from 85.214.73.107 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: anatol.php@belski.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.73.107 klapt.com Received: from [85.214.73.107] ([85.214.73.107:58020] helo=h1123647.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5F/A7-55046-923F1D45 for ; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 05:23:37 -0500 Received: by h1123647.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix, from userid 33) id AF16923D6002; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:23:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from 217.254.137.98 (SquirrelMail authenticated user anatol@belski.net) by webmail.klapt.com with HTTP; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:23:34 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <54D1BC7D.5000504@gmail.com><54D1C59C.5070008@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:23:34 +0100 To: "Tony Marston" Cc: internals@lists.php.net User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.2 [SVN] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Removal of dead or not yet PHP7 ported SAPIs and extensions From: anatol.php@belski.net ("Anatol Belski") Hi Tony, On Wed, February 4, 2015 10:56, Tony Marston wrote: > "Pierre Joye" wrote in message > news:CAEZPtU6au_Fi2bW=E2kiQLErq4h97VhU8NkL-Z9KatLsteFaRQ@mail.gmail.com... > >> >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Stanislav Malyshev >> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> >>>> Libmcrypt is a dead cow but not much of a threat for now. On the >>>> other hand cclient is dangerous, it should have been removed long >>>> time ago already. >>> >>> I'm not sure - what is the dangerous part? Are you referring to some >>> published CVEs or other reports? Then it would be useful to list them >>> here and on the RFC. >> >> I have to dig back (or may be in the last threads where we discussed >> that). I will try to to post them here (RFC is in voting phase so no >> edition) asap. >> >> However, I totally fail to understand your reasoning. We know both >> libraries are dead. ext/Imap is almost not used anymore > > Excuse me, but *I* use ext/imap quite extensively, and I would be most > upset if you dropped it without providing an alternative. > > I would also be upset if you dropped it without ever it ever being marked > as deprecated. > Not like that PECL would be dropped, too :) However you're right, those was not deprecated, just repeatedly discussed in the past. Regards Anatol