Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:81775
Return-Path: <francois@tekwire.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 43256 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2015 07:19:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 4 Feb 2015 07:19:17 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=francois@tekwire.net; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=francois@tekwire.net; sender-id=softfail
Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain tekwire.net does not designate 212.27.42.2 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: francois@tekwire.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.27.42.2 smtp2-g21.free.fr  
Received: from [212.27.42.2] ([212.27.42.2:45536] helo=smtp2-g21.free.fr)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 86/67-20608-4F7C1D45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 02:19:16 -0500
Received: from moorea (unknown [82.240.16.115])
	by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17EF04B0194;
	Wed,  4 Feb 2015 08:15:58 +0100 (CET)
Reply-To: <francois@tekwire.net>
To: "'Cesar Rodas'" <cesar@rodas.me>,
	<internals@lists.php.net>,
	"'Leigh'" <leight@gmail.com>
References: <54D1593A.3000607@rodas.me>
In-Reply-To: <54D1593A.3000607@rodas.me>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 08:19:09 +0100
Message-ID: <00e001d0404a$dea88cd0$9bf9a670$@tekwire.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHI42cOZaEDOAr4MWNQAzx8jlWjtZzuzZfg
Content-Language: fr
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 150203-1, 03/02/2015), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Question regarding stream wrappers and op code cache
From: francois@tekwire.net (=?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois_Laupretre?=)

> De : Cesar Rodas [mailto:cesar@rodas.me]
> I have a doubt, is it efficient include/require files from a source
> different than the "real file system" a stream wrapper class? My
> question is, would the op-code cache work as it would when reading a
> file form the filesystem?

I understand your question but, yes, the feature is essential to =
packages systems like phar and phk (and it is useless for most other =
stream wrappers). Package systems distribute a virtual file tree, handle =
stat(), and returning valid mtimes. So, the opcode cache must be able to =
work with these stream wrappers.

Regards

Fran=C3=A7ois