Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:81669 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 84625 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2015 22:54:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Feb 2015 22:54:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 192.64.116.199 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.64.116.199 imap11-2.ox.privateemail.com Received: from [192.64.116.199] ([192.64.116.199:57181] helo=imap11-2.ox.privateemail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EC/6C-25089-71000D45 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 17:54:15 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F468800E5; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:54:13 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap11.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap11.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id SMpOZ8fCpNED; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:54:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from oa-res-26-240.wireless.abdn.ac.uk (oa-res-26-240.wireless.abdn.ac.uk [137.50.26.240]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4FD78800E2; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:54:11 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 22:54:09 +0000 Cc: Anatol Belski , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <32916F11-0988-45BD-81B5-6BBFEF2D0D9F@ajf.me> References: To: Dan Ackroyd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Removal of dead or not yet PHP7 ported SAPIs and extensions From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) Hi Danack, > On 2 Feb 2015, at 22:50, Dan Ackroyd wrote: >=20 > On 2 February 2015 at 19:11, Anatol Belski = wrote: >> The voting ends on 2015-02-09 at 21:00 CET. >=20 > This is a ridiculously short voting period for a major decision. > Although the minimum voting time for an RFC is one week, that should > only be used in extremis. I wouldn=E2=80=99t say one week is =E2=80=9Cin extremis=E2=80=9D - = it=E2=80=99s reasonable for small, self-contained, BC break-less new = features. Although at least 10 days is usually better. That being said, I agree. This kind of thing shouldn=E2=80=99t be taken = lightly, and this RFC should have a longer voting period. > The people affected by this decision are not likely to read PHP > internals every day or even every week. Yeah, I agree here. The fact there=E2=80=99s not been much discussion = attests to that. +1 -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/