Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:81649
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.51 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFMT4Np7aRsaS=rqcKQY3Zt_sEyR-6qrVV-Om-sYodysY9-Feg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CD0358CC-B891-4093-9566-D9F894D1E3F4@ajf.me>
	<CAFMT4Np7aRsaS=rqcKQY3Zt_sEyR-6qrVV-Om-sYodysY9-Feg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 03:35:33 +0700
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU61QAPU+-NPbBxMmTM-Gntd0-xgX1mgVezLLHcLRe7Zrw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Levi Morrison <levim@php.net>
Cc: Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>, PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Combined Comparison (Spaceship) Operator
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Levi Morrison <levim@php.net> wrote:
>> Since it's been two weeks and there are no remaining issues (aside from the lack of a language specification patch - but that can be done later), I'm opening voting on this RFC.
>
> I just noticed that you kept T_SPACESHIP; while that is fun I don't
> think it is appropriate. It is a common name for the operator, but
> there are other common names as well. Even though I am undecided on
> the merit of the RFC I am voting "no" because of this detail.

Google "spaceship operator", now imagine adding "php", reconsider :)

It is not about funny but easiness to find it and what it is all about.


-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org