Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:81569 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 94690 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2015 09:02:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Feb 2015 09:02:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.214 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.214 mail4-2.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.214] ([217.147.176.214:50820] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 32/85-02376-F2D3FC45 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 04:02:40 -0500 Received: (qmail 12309 invoked by uid 89); 2 Feb 2015 09:00:03 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 12279, pid: 12304, t: 0.0704s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52/d:10677 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.8?) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@86.189.147.37) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 2 Feb 2015 09:00:03 -0000 Message-ID: <54CF3C8F.1010103@lsces.co.uk> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 08:59:59 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <8DCD1B72-C81D-499E-B455-E4A042CD76E6@ajf.me> <54CF3B1A.9090505@beccati.com> In-Reply-To: <54CF3B1A.9090505@beccati.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Scalar Type Hints v0.2 From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) On 02/02/15 08:53, Matteo Beccati wrote: >> I think v0.1 had pretty good chances to get accepted, but I’m not so >> sure about anything that followed. >> I’m definitely -1 on declare(strict). > > I agree. I understand that someone might prefer strict typing, but > declare() seems so different from anything else in php. I think I've > only used it when I needed signal handling and even in that case it felt > so weird. Add to that 'E_STRICT' ... just what is the preferred way of doing things? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk