Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:81568 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 92749 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2015 08:55:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Feb 2015 08:55:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=narf@devilix.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=narf@devilix.net; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain devilix.net designates 209.85.218.50 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: narf@devilix.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.218.50 mail-oi0-f50.google.com Received: from [209.85.218.50] ([209.85.218.50:48480] helo=mail-oi0-f50.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DD/15-02376-B8B3FC45 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 03:55:40 -0500 Received: by mail-oi0-f50.google.com with SMTP id h136so43429219oig.9 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:55:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=devilix.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=JEviImpg5XVOGNqX/WCduEBAR7Y36JHtgo8eeJfAt48=; b=OYQI1QPBiO9YhCIhJXysmaN4P0AWIF5zQbeEXzYLtoePRfPE9W0agBJcdOUHJqcfxY qYReuvAyJ5cqFaEqu8hz8gVxwDHuXafcr5VUpcKGZUFquANIJ4VtJ8eMxVi8GDev4DG0 nGr2dNjq8SJWIO6b2eRDVFS98IUN+ms84b0d8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=JEviImpg5XVOGNqX/WCduEBAR7Y36JHtgo8eeJfAt48=; b=a81ydVEuR4jwVSbPkcEAmQ9V2wpjoW7AjiavW7GI7k0/VOMnVs5cXl4IIF32KNpsr6 +Y/TMAcxYjfYwwSXQbvrszx6wzO1yhqhfAbpzAEE2FXKUuL9LxMKAEHj3amD+kYlDbtE /NME6+j7e/dzBFCoxbt6VMRbemOLqP429w5y/DPbZ9nLqaoyLWUlQOJ9+p4XkTk7uRtj OzHgjVYxtf25IYwshY+8pEPN2EJWDKycdkWietOcNySyrgTEKVb1D+GHHDidmmiyjtU0 qkcwD+tYTbQlj1ZHIM1QYED5wIqsFbtohFp9pzlmqIxrvkjAd6BhxyBLsVfGn9EAnZoY Vj6A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnrrN8L8boBCP0FPqFem7Sf7W7o9Ig2wQxN4DS8nrwOWXWmj6g9D6iXztbKnSkiz20xc34f MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.74.215 with SMTP id x206mr5799761oia.58.1422867337664; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:55:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.214.205 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 00:55:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1E54E93F-8CE1-469F-BE1F-DD2F1DF76E39@ajf.me> References: <8DCD1B72-C81D-499E-B455-E4A042CD76E6@ajf.me> <1E54E93F-8CE1-469F-BE1F-DD2F1DF76E39@ajf.me> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:55:37 +0200 Message-ID: To: Andrea Faulds Cc: Dmitry Stogov , PHP Internals List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Scalar Type Hints v0.2 From: narf@devilix.net (Andrey Andreev) Hi, On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Andrea Faulds wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > >> On 2 Feb 2015, at 07:02, Dmitry Stogov wrote: >> >> As I already told, in my opinion, version 0.1 was the perfect solution that >> fit into PHP semantic very well. > > I don't like the original. Weak types work to a degree, but they don't fulfill the use case of a lot of developers, and consequently the RFC wasn't too popular outside internals. > I still think that caller-controlled "strict mode" doesn't fulfill that use case either. Cheers, Andrey.