Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:81522
Return-Path: <marcio.web2@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 45025 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2015 05:43:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 1 Feb 2015 05:43:00 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=marcio.web2@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=marcio.web2@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.47 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: marcio.web2@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.47 mail-la0-f47.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.215.47] ([209.85.215.47:39166] helo=mail-la0-f47.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id BD/7F-01632-2ECBDC45 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 00:43:00 -0500
Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id hz20so31989179lab.6
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 21:42:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=8alkHOWJOd2Of7GEtncMZ5DD+5DV04XLqVz4+XaYs2g=;
        b=qmG25GbxXFVdtElL0Bd6EqvCA6AFJe3NlYC2Bp7TIrhUiaB80yoqlZG81l+iFs5Up1
         cj+/clpDamTlQhDYDuvcM8RHaDpJxqrJl5B3f9GAGR8xgGO+tXdGkcujUXF6g0K358Uq
         7GsHQzD3RbrVV+NIIgczbeKGkUurEGtLD78aRb7r4BU2LjSLVO6YKcru+q1EHdOBsEAu
         8X11HNT5mK62TRCohL8Xp5uMXD+7snJkTp+rcWrACuuRPGZaza6flT1LjnqaCbTAtwFe
         OcGghwhJp2Rq4hRl1p3Xyk2Lz6/83fnOsiubsI6mg1UoQIY5j3eisxO1qSNvIqz1qUcJ
         FESQ==
X-Received: by 10.112.222.135 with SMTP id qm7mr13504497lbc.19.1422769375962;
 Sat, 31 Jan 2015 21:42:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.21.101 with HTTP; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 21:42:35 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: marcio3w@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <005801d03d82$f79982a0$e6cc87e0$@tutteli.ch>
References: <CAOsHV+tcjxRPqK697hzpWjVFxSFwy0NQZA+OWrLn6g=Q65WQCA@mail.gmail.com>
 <54CCF086.9090904@fischer.name> <005801d03d82$f79982a0$e6cc87e0$@tutteli.ch>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 02:42:35 -0300
Message-ID: <CAOsHV+sZeK_Rrd4mgD2qgX-JNwA0w96CVTKwSrnz0TFYd8tNLg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Stoll <php@tutteli.ch>
Cc: Markus Fischer <markus@fischer.name>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134d228406db9050e004fc1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV][RFC][DISCUSSION] Group Use Declarations
From: marcio.web2@gmail.com (Marcio Almada)

--001a1134d228406db9050e004fc1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi, Robert

> I agree with Markus, the benefits for users which are using IDEs is
marginal. But I suppose all other users could actually benefit from it.
> Yet, with the drawback described by Markus - searching for use statements
without a clever IDE will be more difficult.

No syntax will be perfect from all POVs, but it's still very handy to use
shorthands whenever they become advantageous. The RFC has a lot of examples
regarding this.

> Anyway, thinking in terms of scripting it seems to be a nice feature.
Therefore +1

That's very good to know. Thanks you for your support.

--001a1134d228406db9050e004fc1--