Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:81387 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 15443 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2015 21:02:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jan 2015 21:02:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.45 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.45 mail-qg0-f45.google.com Received: from [209.85.192.45] ([209.85.192.45:36051] helo=mail-qg0-f45.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 53/B2-32597-2DF9AC45 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:02:10 -0500 Received: by mail-qg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id q107so34213410qgd.4 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 13:02:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=ghA4Mt7bLlkLb6U/j/oAqVnsTG4RAs44yL6PzmSudE8=; b=r5BGdJNOVqxysM7gDYooEeKNtWQurxO7bwfRropO7qUdIwyRAEjtlw+yJ0SBIkt1LF aZ7bfkmt5/TXJeC2KOf9E0zvPY35BHRqrp2b+7E8KoVXjBzULJUCni1+fgXohzBm5hKE JakuP6YKvVPx9Vl1HajNSW/M7nbhH+ibFavmULnoX5FgKcc8IWzYiYCMYFtZOxEQvLtw 7Aw0pJ2qsi5ABGrQFVCV2voeKbetwoVHyyRPNyy6IJqJecLXVpB3UOxP5sM9ePI1GETg VnkLHMDb8w9YQzxD8PEWTg8EfipQtnpNDPSbWLAVlxKNzzQEr9LPdiJZ7U98qylIuNGs zoCg== X-Received: by 10.224.111.194 with SMTP id t2mr5117562qap.86.1422565327463; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 13:02:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.93.70 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 13:01:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54CA2512.5040807@googlemail.com> References: <54CA2512.5040807@googlemail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:01:27 +0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: pmUc-NExC88wAE2afV-weB2owQ8 Message-ID: To: Crypto Compress Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b604582036ab3050dd0cdba Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [DISCUSSION] pecl_http From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki) --047d7b604582036ab3050dd0cdba Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi all, On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Crypto Compress < cryptocompress@googlemail.com> wrote: > possible points: > - PHP-FIG propose no implementations; pecl_http does > - PHP-FIG focus on frameworks; pecl_http in core is useable without > dependencies by every simple script > - PSR-7 is a moving target; pecl_http exists for ten years > - PSR-7 can be complementary to pecl_http not the other way around (c code > can't use php code?) > - native implementations should be faster > General pros - PHP is made for Web. API like pecl_http should be included by default. - Script implementation and module implementation can co-exists. Example is mail/imap. Now I understand why many people dislike this proposal probably. Native module/script implementations may exist both. New module may be added/replaced at any time if it's required/reasonable. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net --047d7b604582036ab3050dd0cdba--