Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:81301 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 33142 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2015 11:17:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Jan 2015 11:17:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.48 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.48 mail-qg0-f48.google.com Received: from [209.85.192.48] ([209.85.192.48:55799] helo=mail-qg0-f48.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C7/9E-45774-345C8C45 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 06:17:23 -0500 Received: by mail-qg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id z60so16119484qgd.7 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 03:17:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=qrhdDkA4GkETRKaqZRxGST9NIQVwfo3FHI6oziTuDOA=; b=EGZVsuuQOQj5XM6Kr62ENCkrQZL9Em5Q/7FcUr/U/xppvRzh5ba3thS/mq1f9/cRTY DBNNnPXZ+cLMZy5gDjNWDeBLywnwwIYhwSa3uNX6GJezKif14xFr9hMIVsIx11sUulPo 6okdp5jJhWzKdODEUtyjBjc2xcrJDCVryzBzZFHStPpQtPrCSl6dSMEFebjXh6KoWGEl KkktC/ruvRt+7dNeSqfq9bRPT9l0YciKB1WTo596HrNbwrCj8tWRTRL+kJsNZMlTCFjc sRdMSgXZifZV7BARVggBsy5/xU4ki4SXDCyDHuy0Bl8lmdo1NjMmk+eazSEVMSY4AcNs b5QQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.100.226 with SMTP id s89mr11422883qge.96.1422443840096; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 03:17:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.3.168 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 03:17:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.3.168 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 03:17:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54C8B099.1040409@php.net> References: <54C1261D.7080009@php.net> <21F16F7C-CEBE-4498-A539-E2E66EE147F7@php.net> <54C8B099.1040409@php.net> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:17:19 +0700 Message-ID: To: Michael Wallner Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c16f08cd51fd050db483f5 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] pecl_http From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) --001a11c16f08cd51fd050db483f5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Jan 28, 2015 4:49 PM, "Michael Wallner" wrote: > > On 23/01/15 09:27, Michael Wallner wrote: > > > >> On 23 01 2015, at 02:40, Pierre Joye wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Michael Wallner > >> wrote: > >>> Hi! > >>> > >>> Now, that I'm mostly done with porting pecl/http [1] and > >>> dependencies (propro [2] and raphf [3]) to ZE3 I'd like to > >>> restart discussion on the topic, whether it is feasible to add > >>> pecl_http as a bundled extension to the core. > >>> > >>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http > >>> > [...] > >> By the way, I did not yet look more deeply to raphf and propro but > >> that's something I like to discuss. If their feautures are useful > >> for other parts of the core, extensions, bundled or not, we should > >> consider moving them to the main APIs and not as two new > >> independent extensions. > >> > [...] > > I think a short discussion about where to put the dependant code and > > noting the outcome in the RFC could be the way to go. I guess just a > > few people who think that pecl_http is about to be included would > > suffice. > > I just pushed a tree with pecl/http merged to ext/http, pecl/propro > merged to ext/standard and pecl/raphf merged to main/. > > https://github.com/m6w6/php-src/tree/merge-http Nice move!! Thanks :) I am all for it :) > > -- > Regards, > Mike --001a11c16f08cd51fd050db483f5--