Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:81120
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.218.54 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <54C4A44F.2030902@gmail.com>
References: <54C4A44F.2030902@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 04:13:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFMT4NpvO5AchYWOAsUHst=7s1nrunBnebAx8QstGzxvTq7uPQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Vote results for default ctors RFC
From: levim@php.net (Levi Morrison)

> I am a bit disappointed by the result, as I think it would be a good
> change, but I am much more disappointed by the fact that that 20 people
> voted against it and not even half of them - I would say maybe 1/5 of
> them - chose to participate in discussion even minimally and explain
> what is wrong with it in their opinion. I understand when everybody
> agrees there's no need of the flood of +1s, vote is enough, but
> disagreement by its nature is more diverse.

It was a fairly simple proposed change with a well-defined set of
impacted change; what diversity of disagreement do you expect?