Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:81119
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <54C4A44F.2030902@gmail.com>
References: <54C4A44F.2030902@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:52:50 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKxcST875eALqofUGfFgxN6fh1+1UVJUqY2W6Dd65x5d6STmZQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1132ebe2b4cf45050d77d2bc
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Vote results for default ctors RFC
From: dragoonis@gmail.com (Paul Dragoonis)

--001a1132ebe2b4cf45050d77d2bc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Stas,

Maybe a cool wiki feature addition is: once people vote they could
optionally leave a comment right there on the wiki, which we could collect
and read. Thoughts?

Here's my feedback for you on why i voted No.

1) It felt a bit too "magic" for me, with no real gain from an internal or
userland perspective.

2) I don't see a flood of people coming to the mailing list complaining
about this feature, so I'm not compelled to want it in the language.

As always, thanks for your efforts.



On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi!
>
> The vote for RFC https://wiki.php.net/rfc/default_ctor has been
> concluded, with the result of 27 vs. 20. Since 2/3 majority is required
> for acceptance, the RFC has been declined.
>
> I am a bit disappointed by the result, as I think it would be a good
> change, but I am much more disappointed by the fact that that 20 people
> voted against it and not even half of them - I would say maybe 1/5 of
> them - chose to participate in discussion even minimally and explain
> what is wrong with it in their opinion. I understand when everybody
> agrees there's no need of the flood of +1s, vote is enough, but
> disagreement by its nature is more diverse. I think not bothering to
> discuss and then just voting "no" with no explanation is not how the
> healthy RFC process should be working.
>
> --
> Stas Malyshev
> smalyshev@gmail.com
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

--001a1132ebe2b4cf45050d77d2bc--