Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:81113
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.176 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <54C4A44F.2030902@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 00:07:43 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [RFC] Vote results for default ctors RFC
From: smalyshev@gmail.com (Stanislav Malyshev)

Hi!

The vote for RFC https://wiki.php.net/rfc/default_ctor has been
concluded, with the result of 27 vs. 20. Since 2/3 majority is required
for acceptance, the RFC has been declined.

I am a bit disappointed by the result, as I think it would be a good
change, but I am much more disappointed by the fact that that 20 people
voted against it and not even half of them - I would say maybe 1/5 of
them - chose to participate in discussion even minimally and explain
what is wrong with it in their opinion. I understand when everybody
agrees there's no need of the flood of +1s, vote is enough, but
disagreement by its nature is more diverse. I think not bothering to
discuss and then just voting "no" with no explanation is not how the
healthy RFC process should be working.

-- 
Stas Malyshev
smalyshev@gmail.com