Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:81081
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.177 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <54B1C50F.7020304@gmail.com>
References: <54B1C50F.7020304@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 01:50:43 +0900
Message-ID: <CAGa2bXYj_Xe7Atqf4X_O1qg9LtLKcM-1xpgF_6EfbCf4rABdpQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c12f8c31bd08050d68b70a
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][VOTE] Default parent constructors RFC
From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki)

--001a11c12f8c31bd08050d68b70a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi all,

On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'd like to initiate a vote on this RFC:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/default_ctor
>
> TLDR: this RFC would make a call to parent::__construct() succeed (as in
> "not produce a fatal error") even if the parent class does not define a
> ctor. Same for __destruct and __clone. The motivation for it is in the
> RFC and here:
> https://php100.wordpress.com/2014/11/04/default-constructors/
>
> I've chosen the simplest way of implementing it, as suggested by Dmitry,
> in https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/990. There are other
> alternatives, but I think the simpler the better.
>
> Previous discussion is at: http://marc.info/?t=141630266000001&r=2&w=2
>

It seems -1 vote are increasing. Therefore, I would like to mention
benefits of this RFC again.

This RFC is great for rapid app development/prototyping. There are many
cases that base
class constructors calls are needed or not. This RFC allow us to just call
parent constructor,
then add implementation later if it is needed.

It makes code maintenance easier for production code also.

I can understand the reason why people vote -1 (non existent
method/function calls should
not be able to be called and raise), but benefits override. IMHO.

PHP is for easier/faster development, isn't it?

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net

--001a11c12f8c31bd08050d68b70a--