Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:81074 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57898 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2015 14:32:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Jan 2015 14:32:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rowan.collins@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rowan.collins@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rowan.collins@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.178 mail-we0-f178.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.178] ([74.125.82.178:34659] helo=mail-we0-f178.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D8/E0-49997-FFCA3C45 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 09:32:31 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id k48so2177297wev.9 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 06:32:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:from:date:to :message-id; bh=gUykOyVAIa9vAhCSgbo4HR3g0X5bI31yiJ+yxvdtslk=; b=mW4HSxD9cjAoG4Wdr+5j04Hr1csDI4Uy6E5K3Hj7sH6HTT472AMhN6+N6HevJ8SlSt lrughUeYZJtl1TsKNhGDfgDrULSWxTAqT1R5bgWySeee3PIh+deXzTIH3xskQxnC2CiA Qe1SuZVX68/LuKHLuU7QbZ5nrWluMg2QWCRpbm77+kdMsh6wN6nsA9h5OFtKrrV6yD+L ziXqU8XrgXsCn865nmq7odwH4GDLWkMDKYJCtQW8q/EvgdP2ArXp1vlKOcSf+ovQjoTj Ouj6fMwUSTHwr7M6t2FU0be52Cw1PBUIyCM/GIQsXMHC2aO+12SiYovetZaCwGIXp9dk j6Dg== X-Received: by 10.180.12.75 with SMTP id w11mr8097210wib.9.1422109499002; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 06:24:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (cpc68956-brig15-2-0-cust215.3-3.cable.virginm.net. [82.6.24.216]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k1sm6431815wjn.9.2015.01.24.06.24.58 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 24 Jan 2015 06:24:58 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <54C2E405.4090204@gmail.com> References: <54BEC072.5000507@mabe.berlin> <54C28B63.1040506@gmail.com> <54C2E405.4090204@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 14:24:56 +0000 To: Stanislav Malyshev ,internals@lists.php.net Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Inconsistencies in callable, call_user_func and direct variable calls From: rowan.collins@gmail.com (Rowan Collins) On 24 January 2015 00:15:01 GMT, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: >Hi! > >> Foo::bar(); // OK >> ['Foo', 'bar'](); // OK >> 'Foo::bar'(); // FATAL ERROR > >I'm not sure why one would ever need/want the latter. IMO, it just >looks >weird. Well, they both look weird as literals like that, but the array looks the wierder of the two to me. Representing a static call in some external configuration is an example where a single string in normal PHP syntax would make more sense than needing to create a 2-element array.