Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:80758 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28266 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2015 18:52:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jan 2015 18:52:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.181 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.181 mail-qc0-f181.google.com Received: from [209.85.216.181] ([209.85.216.181:41796] helo=mail-qc0-f181.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 26/C2-18613-EF00CB45 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 13:52:46 -0500 Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id l6so14757949qcy.12 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 10:52:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=awB38tZax6176FfqrlMWx1pvj7ege0d7paygy0+m764=; b=gWN8zi60AR/+TdNsRNdwL/UsZ8zl2GqvkQFc+qu/Xs90te46XadqD+nmD4dy14xjOg z8jPw1+alY5L/tWOQl9Jr+opJlm2dXlTsQf8JGffxp6eXIeLzU4mRHVLDteCzyKG4L3b UVY0fgG6yd4VIIqXEeI7gTb5WZ+cs9svLqCsk7v5qzmKnaYJg5AK51RNMkbTZ5dngJSE jnUW9IjCzMcB7nA78rYNCEpxhvD+bDdPow/lglgD0uTOApVOyZdh78nkF6OsbRPZaIHT fSh/iGNHBxhXdDrjxNP+73xfHmWBiJXH/Bt4y3pkKDKeBc1iLIooE95lSda6AvmaShDS zR2A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.32.38 with SMTP id g35mr25372895qgg.54.1421607162827; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 10:52:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.22.106 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 10:52:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.22.106 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 10:52:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1CD8C39C-8830-4F95-812D-34DA83A7782F@welsh.co.nz> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 01:52:42 +0700 Message-ID: To: Andrea Faulds Cc: PHP internals , Yasuo Ohgaki , Simon J Welsh , Levi Morrison Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1139bcdaf35976050cf1b506 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Vote] Return Types From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) --001a1139bcdaf35976050cf1b506 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Jan 19, 2015 1:21 AM, "Andrea Faulds" wrote: > > Hey Pierre, > > > On 18 Jan 2015, at 16:55, Pierre Joye wrote: > > > > Addint/editing it means a re vote. > > I don=E2=80=99t think this is always true. For minor changes to the RFC t= ext that provide clarifications and do not change the actual proposal, there=E2=80= =99s no problem with editing during voting. > > In this case, the position of the return type in the anonymous function syntax isn=E2=80=99t a new detail of the proposal, as it was already in the= patch. Adding it to the RFC would just help clear things up. If the RFC is not clear, it should not proposed to vote on in the 1st place= . There must be no edit during the vote phase. It has abused too often already. Be ready or wait until you are. > Thanks. > > -- > Andrea Faulds > http://ajf.me/ > > > > --001a1139bcdaf35976050cf1b506--