Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:80757 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 26132 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2015 18:28:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jan 2015 18:28:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 192.64.116.207 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.64.116.207 imap2-2.ox.privateemail.com Received: from [192.64.116.207] ([192.64.116.207:59164] helo=imap2-2.ox.privateemail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 39/62-18613-76BFBB45 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 13:28:55 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4358C0069; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 13:28:52 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap2.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap2.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 4SQz39EKwczE; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 13:28:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from oa-res-26-240.wireless.abdn.ac.uk (oa-res-26-240.wireless.abdn.ac.uk [137.50.26.240]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C58658C0009; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 13:28:50 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 18:28:48 +0000 Cc: Nikita Popov , Pascal MARTIN AFUP , PHP internals , Juan Basso Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <54BAD8B4.9010101@pascal-martin.fr> To: Pierre Joye X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Preserve Fractional Part in JSON encode From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) Hey Pierre, > On 18 Jan 2015, at 17:17, Pierre Joye wrote: >=20 > Except that this one is not self contained and the rfc says in rare = cases > (or say, for good reason). Does it? With the flag turned off (default), behaviour is exactly the = same as before. With the flag on, behaviour is changed. Seems fairly self-contained to me, just an extra flag. It does affect = performance, but positively, so not a problem. Thanks. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/