Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:80543 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 87404 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2015 14:53:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Jan 2015 14:53:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=kontakt@beberlei.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=kontakt@beberlei.de; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain beberlei.de from 74.125.82.53 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: kontakt@beberlei.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.53 mail-wg0-f53.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.53] ([74.125.82.53:50240] helo=mail-wg0-f53.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5C/3C-14306-C74D7B45 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:53:49 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id x13so15350207wgg.12 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 06:53:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=oFBodCKUcokF4HJHJQoOawqHCIVyzqRbLfjshjL37qw=; b=nJXJuZUgd2fdGe1pccDtej8nmz9xqWlRr02RS2zJxNlrBfmY6a8LTYJJSaoHnXWbYC sB70EYD3dzXGThaEEop2Ltk5uiUte+DTLIeC2c31tA3sFTdFPcWvHo0NAAFnJIvIjYks 7yhA2vEOnjIKGtZjW2lnQ3z31x134QIe3O3lxLVQnYxqtC5DinAE+6v5Iqu9srIfYYQo L8LOP80ov/i0Wj7yg76swfYVZejhKd/R850nwNlvYNNmGDInWuAyoycrJY9C9Oe8ysXx neWPSiMZ8bD7NDm+mVKanx6rLgpYxZNTrMcI8wJVRrF3ChI/tsIRULykwlSdpd5gysqq ZUig== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl+Or175RGX0uzam3GkVZlMD9umX2oaZFpELOxFZxmp3IIc5OjPF7CHY0aANTeuMrfqBWyN MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.105.68 with SMTP id gk4mr19439909wib.30.1421333623745; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 06:53:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.57.73 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 06:53:43 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [77.13.198.204] In-Reply-To: <2sifbatnqq22e8pfunkh575o1plj81rk7j@4ax.com> References: <2sifbatnqq22e8pfunkh575o1plj81rk7j@4ax.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:53:43 +0100 Message-ID: To: Jan Ehrhardt Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04426a60c04b6e050cb205cf Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Top 10 Pecl extensions PHP7 compatibility From: kontakt@beberlei.de (Benjamin Eberlei) --f46d04426a60c04b6e050cb205cf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Not sure how that helps, since you would tag versions anyways using semver, so if there is a master vs next/phpng branch, then they might still result in two tags v1.0 and v2.0 and there is no way to automatically resolve this. On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > Julien Pauli in php.internals (Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:53:10 +0100): > >This will allow more people to help testing both PHP7 (some people may > need > >some of the top-10 pecl ext to run their apps) and those extensions. > > Some time ago I had a discussion with Mike Wallner and others about a > naming convention for php7/php5.x branches of extensions. It would be > easier to build a lot of extensions for PHP7 if most extension > maintainers used the same names. > > See https://www.mail-archive.com/pecl-dev@lists.php.net/msg02585.html > > Brief summary: > Compiling for php7: use the phpng branch if it exists, otherwise master. > Compiling for php5.x: use the phpog branch if exists, otherwise master. > > Michael used phpng for the php7 branch, but since that discussion I > already see other branch names pop up. I believe a branch 'next' was > introduced in opcache or some extension like that. > > A 'Top 10 Pecl extensions PHP7 compatibility' should at least contain > the name of the PHP7 branch if that is not the master branch. And some > sort of consensus on the names of PHP7 and/or PHP5 branches would be > helpful. > > Jan > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > --f46d04426a60c04b6e050cb205cf--